Skip to main content

Dealing with Troubled Connections to SQL Express

We had a problem with an install today for a SQL application and SQL Express. The database was created properly and we set up Express to accept remote connections, but for some reason, none of the client machines would connect to it.



The error we were getting was ConnectionOpen (gethostbyname()).



It was frustrating to say the least - we tried switching between TCP/IP and Named Pipes and a variety of things - all to no avail - until I came across this post:



SQL Server Express WebLog : How to: Configure Express to accept remote connections



Finding this post was particularly troublesome - after about 15 minutes of solid searching, we finally found it referenced over on the SQL Education Center.



At any rate, we switched over to accessing the server directly by IP address and it worked perfectly.



Since it was easier to test by using a DSN with ODBC, even though we really use a connect string, we were able to pull back the Connect string easily with SQLGETPROP.



ln = sqlconnect("TestDNS")

IF ln <1

    MESSAGEBOX("Did not connect")

ENDIF

lc = SQLGETPROP(ln,"ConnectString")

STRTOFILE(lc,"connect.ini")



Finding the solution however should have been easier in my mind. The MS KB had nothing that really helped except "blame the XP SP2 firewall".



So I post the link here in an effort to make the search easier.









Powered by ScribeFire.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Blogs and RSS come to Microsoft.com

MS has just introduced their portal and it's pretty comprehensive. Nothing quite like learning that some people use AIM instead of MSN messenger, or that there really may be a need for supporting 4 monitors ( Cyrus Complains ) However, it's really a great sign that MS is serious about supporting the blogging community which seems to have um, exploded in size in the past year. Blogs and RSS come to Microsoft.com
1 comment
Read more

Elevating Project Specifications with Three Insightful ChatGPT Prompts

For developers and testers, ChatGPT, the freely accessible tool from OpenAI, is game-changing. If you want to learn a new programming language, ask for samples or have it convert your existing code. This can be done in Visual Studio Code (using GitHub CoPilot) or directly in the ChatGPT app or web site.  If you’re a tester, ChatGPT can write a test spec or actual test code (if you use Jest or Cypress) based on existing code, copied and pasted into the input area. But ChatGPT can be of huge value for analysts (whether system or business) who need to validate their needs. There’s often a disconnect between developers and analysts. Analysts complain that developers don’t build what they asked for or ask too many questions. Developers complain that analysts haven’t thought of obvious things. In these situations, ChatGPT can be a great intermediary. At its worst, it forces you to think about and then discount obvious issues. At best, it clarifies the needs into documented requirements. ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Programmers vs. Developers vs. Architects

I received an email this morning from Brandon Savage 's newsletter. Brandon's a PHP guru (works at Mozilla) but his newsletter and books have some great overall perspectives for developers of all languages. However, this last one (What's the difference between developers and architects?) kind of rubs me the wrong way. Either that, or I've just missed the natural inflation of job descriptions. (maybe, it's like the change in terminology between Garbage man and Waste Engineer or Secretary and Office Administrator) So maybe it's just me - but I think there's still a big difference between Programmer, Developer and then of course, architect. The key thing here is that every role has a different perspective and every one of those perspectives has value. The original MSF create roles like Product Manager, Program Manager, Developer, Tester, etc - so every concept may pigeon hole people into different roles. But the statements Brandon makes are often distinction...
12 comments
Read more