Skip to main content

Managing Project Specifications with MindManager

I noted earlier how much I appreciated Eric Sink's Requirements post - I also agreed with his issue about hard it is to get a good spec. It should start off as a document but then eventually turn into a To-Do list.



One of the tools I use frequently is MindManager from MindJet. It's a great brainstorming tool but I decided to try and use it for writing a small project spec recently.



As a spec tool, it actually meets the various critiera that Eric sets out. You build your entire spec with key issues and elements (I've attached a PDF of the Map here:

<img src="http://www.aksel.com/KeyChanger.jpg">



So, you can easily export the document into Word so it can be a real document to give to customers or managers. But then when you are ready to manage it, you can export it to Outlook Tasks (for smaller items), Microsoft Project (for full project files) or any other tool.



I've exported it to a set of web pages here



In my project, I actually take it from MindManager and put it into a Basecamp WriteBoard and then create individual tasks in BaseCamp for the various steps. But the key tool here is MindManager - which lets me add items quickly and easily as well as link them together.



What tools do YOU use for writing and updating project specs?





Powered by ScribeFire.

Comments

Anonymous said…
Hi Andrew,

My name is Gaelen and I work in customer advocacy for Mindjet, makers of MindManager. I just came across your blog posting and wanted to touch base with you. Did you know MindManager 7 is currently in beta? I'd like to send you a copy to test as well as some project management resources. Shoot me back an email at gaelen.oconnell@mindjet.com.

Thanks and hope to hear from you,

Gaelen
Jon said…
A great tool for sharing and updating projects is Huddle (similar to Basecamp but easier to manage multiple projects) - you should have a look at www.huddle.net :)
Anonymous said…
I am using free tool - FreeMind for my new project. It is similar with MindJet, but less as graphical as MindJet.

http://freemind.sourceforge.net/wiki/index.php/Main_Page

Popular posts from this blog

Elevating Project Specifications with Three Insightful ChatGPT Prompts

For developers and testers, ChatGPT, the freely accessible tool from OpenAI, is game-changing. If you want to learn a new programming language, ask for samples or have it convert your existing code. This can be done in Visual Studio Code (using GitHub CoPilot) or directly in the ChatGPT app or web site.  If you’re a tester, ChatGPT can write a test spec or actual test code (if you use Jest or Cypress) based on existing code, copied and pasted into the input area. But ChatGPT can be of huge value for analysts (whether system or business) who need to validate their needs. There’s often a disconnect between developers and analysts. Analysts complain that developers don’t build what they asked for or ask too many questions. Developers complain that analysts haven’t thought of obvious things. In these situations, ChatGPT can be a great intermediary. At its worst, it forces you to think about and then discount obvious issues. At best, it clarifies the needs into documented requirements. ...

Blogs and RSS come to Microsoft.com

MS has just introduced their portal and it's pretty comprehensive. Nothing quite like learning that some people use AIM instead of MSN messenger, or that there really may be a need for supporting 4 monitors ( Cyrus Complains ) However, it's really a great sign that MS is serious about supporting the blogging community which seems to have um, exploded in size in the past year. Blogs and RSS come to Microsoft.com

I’m Supposed to Know

https://programmingzen.com/im-supposed-to-know/ Great post for developers who are struggling with unrealistic expectations of what they should know and what they shouldn't. Thirty-forty years ago, it was possible to know a lot about a certain environment - that environment was MS-DOS (for non Mac/UNIX systems). . There was pretty much only a handful of ways to get things going. Enter networking. That added a new wrinkle to how systems worked. Networks back then were finicky. One of my first jobs was working on a 3COM + LAN and it then migrated to LAN Manager. Enter Windows or the graphical user interface. The best depiction of the complexity Windows (OS/2, Windows NT, etc) introduced that I recall was by Charles Petzold (if memory serves) at a local user group meeting. He invited a bunch of people on the stage and then acted as the Windows "Colonel", a nice play on kernel. Each person had a role but to complete their job they always had to pass things back to h...