Skip to main content

What Happens when Analysts have too much time on their hands

BugBash is awesome.

Has this ever happened to you? I'm not discounting use-case scenarios and the like, but sometimes analysts and managers go way too far trying to "describe" the environment about their needs instead of actually defining the need itself.

These people need training in elevator speeches. Maybe a similar approach would work for better analysis: if you can't describe the problem or solution in 30 seconds or less, then maybe you need to rethink the issue.

As I weed through my various emails outlining problems and solutions, I keep on coming back to it. And lo and behold, Guy just posted something similar about the Executive Summary - no it's not 30 seconds and it's really about "selling" the solution but when you've got analysts and developers living in separate "houses", "selling" does become part of the landscape.

"I have a potential solution - can I convince you that my way is the right way to resolve it, or not?"

Let's not waste time about drawing up sketches and ideas with pretty pictures - if you can describe it, sketch it or give me one thing that explains it in less than a minute, chances are it can be built the way you described.

(and no, I'm not even touch the idea that what you described may not be what you wanted - that's a topic for another day).

Hans' comics do a great job of explaining this in so many ways.

Bug Bash » Archive » Judging by the Diorama

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Blogs and RSS come to Microsoft.com

MS has just introduced their portal and it's pretty comprehensive. Nothing quite like learning that some people use AIM instead of MSN messenger, or that there really may be a need for supporting 4 monitors ( Cyrus Complains ) However, it's really a great sign that MS is serious about supporting the blogging community which seems to have um, exploded in size in the past year. Blogs and RSS come to Microsoft.com

Elevating Project Specifications with Three Insightful ChatGPT Prompts

For developers and testers, ChatGPT, the freely accessible tool from OpenAI, is game-changing. If you want to learn a new programming language, ask for samples or have it convert your existing code. This can be done in Visual Studio Code (using GitHub CoPilot) or directly in the ChatGPT app or web site.  If you’re a tester, ChatGPT can write a test spec or actual test code (if you use Jest or Cypress) based on existing code, copied and pasted into the input area. But ChatGPT can be of huge value for analysts (whether system or business) who need to validate their needs. There’s often a disconnect between developers and analysts. Analysts complain that developers don’t build what they asked for or ask too many questions. Developers complain that analysts haven’t thought of obvious things. In these situations, ChatGPT can be a great intermediary. At its worst, it forces you to think about and then discount obvious issues. At best, it clarifies the needs into documented requirements. ...

Programmers vs. Developers vs. Architects

I received an email this morning from Brandon Savage 's newsletter. Brandon's a PHP guru (works at Mozilla) but his newsletter and books have some great overall perspectives for developers of all languages. However, this last one (What's the difference between developers and architects?) kind of rubs me the wrong way. Either that, or I've just missed the natural inflation of job descriptions. (maybe, it's like the change in terminology between Garbage man and Waste Engineer or Secretary and Office Administrator) So maybe it's just me - but I think there's still a big difference between Programmer, Developer and then of course, architect. The key thing here is that every role has a different perspective and every one of those perspectives has value. The original MSF create roles like Product Manager, Program Manager, Developer, Tester, etc - so every concept may pigeon hole people into different roles. But the statements Brandon makes are often distinction...