Skip to main content

Pet Peeves: _SCREEN.Activeform

While it's a great product, there are just times that FoxPro really drives me nuts.

A great example? _SCREEN.Activeform.

I know people have ranted about this for years so now it's my turn.

_SCREEN.Activeform returns a pointer to the current form object. But what if there's no current form?

Does it return NULL? An empty string?

No. It errors out.

Does anyone know what the reasoning was here?

Now, you can verify it by doing

IF TYPE("_SCREEN.Activeform")="U"
** Now you KNOW there's no form there.
ELSE
ENDIF

but then you still have to do a

IF NOT ISNULL(_SCREEN.Activeform)

ENDIF

Note that you can't use VARTYPE() because Activeform isn't a variable. (example : VARTYPE(_SCREEN.activeform)) - which is a shame because VARTYPE is the faster of the two.

In that blog post, if you read the comments, you'll hear things like "use PEMSTATUS" instead of Type for objects but the problem here is that ActiveForm IS a valid property for _SCREEN (unless you actually want to refer to it).

I thought I could be clever and maybe look at _SCREEN.FormCount but guess what? If a form is defined but hidden, the ActiveForm is still not there but FormCount is 1.

So the end result is you HAVE to use the slower, uglier type approach to get out of these annoying checks for _SCREEN.Activeform.

IF TYPE("_SCREEN.Activeform")<>"U"
** do something with it - _SCREEN.Activeform
ELSE
** don't do anything otherwise you'll error out.
ENDIF

Now will users notice the performance penalty? That's a tough call - but I do know that it adds three unnecessary lines of code which adds to the Refactorability of a program.

Comments

Anonymous said…
I usually use
IF TYPE("_SCREEN.Activeform.Name") = "C"
*- Do something with it
ENDIF

The typecheck for the property digs into the object if it exists. The type-function internal error catch will catch the error (but sets the MESSAGE() returned value. what's up with that, anyhow?)
No need for the ISNULL() check.

Sietse Wijnker
Anonymous said…
If you have an ActiveX control on a form sometimes _SCREEN.ActiveForm refers to the control, not to the form it's on. I haven't tested if this bug has been fixed in the meantime, because our framework has a method to return the active form that deals with it.

Popular posts from this blog

Blogs and RSS come to Microsoft.com

MS has just introduced their portal and it's pretty comprehensive. Nothing quite like learning that some people use AIM instead of MSN messenger, or that there really may be a need for supporting 4 monitors ( Cyrus Complains ) However, it's really a great sign that MS is serious about supporting the blogging community which seems to have um, exploded in size in the past year. Blogs and RSS come to Microsoft.com

Elevating Project Specifications with Three Insightful ChatGPT Prompts

For developers and testers, ChatGPT, the freely accessible tool from OpenAI, is game-changing. If you want to learn a new programming language, ask for samples or have it convert your existing code. This can be done in Visual Studio Code (using GitHub CoPilot) or directly in the ChatGPT app or web site.  If you’re a tester, ChatGPT can write a test spec or actual test code (if you use Jest or Cypress) based on existing code, copied and pasted into the input area. But ChatGPT can be of huge value for analysts (whether system or business) who need to validate their needs. There’s often a disconnect between developers and analysts. Analysts complain that developers don’t build what they asked for or ask too many questions. Developers complain that analysts haven’t thought of obvious things. In these situations, ChatGPT can be a great intermediary. At its worst, it forces you to think about and then discount obvious issues. At best, it clarifies the needs into documented requirements. ...

Programmers vs. Developers vs. Architects

I received an email this morning from Brandon Savage 's newsletter. Brandon's a PHP guru (works at Mozilla) but his newsletter and books have some great overall perspectives for developers of all languages. However, this last one (What's the difference between developers and architects?) kind of rubs me the wrong way. Either that, or I've just missed the natural inflation of job descriptions. (maybe, it's like the change in terminology between Garbage man and Waste Engineer or Secretary and Office Administrator) So maybe it's just me - but I think there's still a big difference between Programmer, Developer and then of course, architect. The key thing here is that every role has a different perspective and every one of those perspectives has value. The original MSF create roles like Product Manager, Program Manager, Developer, Tester, etc - so every concept may pigeon hole people into different roles. But the statements Brandon makes are often distinction...