Skip to main content

YAG - VFP Keynote SQL Demos

Major SQL Enhancements
The ability to do nested queries and subselects is going to be huge. Not only were the performance times better (4 seconds vs .004) but the fact that you have one command to do the work of what you previously needed 4 is welcome.
 
VFP SQL and SQL Server SQL are far more compatible
 
Samples:
DELETE products FROM manufacturer WHERE manufact.proddisc=.T.
UPDATE products SET price = price *.9 from manufact WHERE proddisc = .t.
 
Ability to do a SELECT on your Buffered table. Now you can compare
 
SELECT a.city,b.city FROM customer a  WITH BUFFERING = .F. JOIN customers b WITH buffering = .T.
 
New corrections made with the new SET ENGINEBEHAVIOR 90.  Top N now works properly. If you only ask for the top 9, you will only get the top 9 (previously, you would get the top 9 values).
 
Transactions on Free Tables
MAKETRANSACTABLE()
BEGIN TRANSACTION
 
ROLLBACK
 
Major Performance Improvements on SQL Speed
 
New type of Index: a BINARY index. - IDEAL for Logical fields.
Table with 1000 roads and an index on DELETED().
The new BINARY index
The old index with a delete would bloat the CDX for DELETED records from 24K to 56K.
With the Binary Index, the file is only 4K and after the deleted now , the file is STILL only 4K
This is great for network files.
 
FLUSH FORCE now absolutely forces the flush directly on the Operating system.
 
SYS(3054,12,"cMemvar") - now puts SQL ShowPlan to a memory variable or to a file.
 
New Data type: varchar (a character field that automatically does an RTRIM) - just like SQL.
 
ICASE( ) now lets you create an inline case statement
SELECT ICASE(prov="ON","Ontario",prov="QC","Quebec")
 
New CAST function to convert a field to a new data type in one single statement.
 
XMLAdapters - now supports nested XML. LoadXML now accepts any XML with XPath.
 
CursorAdapters - tell cursor adapter to automatically return a value for a new record (On Demand Record Refresh)
 
 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Elevating Project Specifications with Three Insightful ChatGPT Prompts

For developers and testers, ChatGPT, the freely accessible tool from OpenAI, is game-changing. If you want to learn a new programming language, ask for samples or have it convert your existing code. This can be done in Visual Studio Code (using GitHub CoPilot) or directly in the ChatGPT app or web site.  If you’re a tester, ChatGPT can write a test spec or actual test code (if you use Jest or Cypress) based on existing code, copied and pasted into the input area. But ChatGPT can be of huge value for analysts (whether system or business) who need to validate their needs. There’s often a disconnect between developers and analysts. Analysts complain that developers don’t build what they asked for or ask too many questions. Developers complain that analysts haven’t thought of obvious things. In these situations, ChatGPT can be a great intermediary. At its worst, it forces you to think about and then discount obvious issues. At best, it clarifies the needs into documented requirements. ...

Respect

Respect is something humans give to each other through personal connection. It’s the bond that forms when we recognize something—or someone—as significant, relatable, or worthy of care. This connection doesn’t have to be limited to people. There was an  article  recently that described the differing attitudes towards AI tools such as ChatGPT and Google Gemini (formerly Bard). Some people treat them like a standard search while others form a sort of personal relationship — being courteous, saying “please” and “thank you”. Occasionally, people share extra details unrelated to their question, like, ‘I’m going to a wedding. What flower goes well with a tuxedo?’ Does an AI “care” how you respond to it? Of course not — it reflects the patterns it’s trained on. Yet our interaction shapes how these tools evolve, and that influence is something we should take seriously. Most of us have all expressed frustration when an AI “hallucinates”. Real or not, the larger issue is that we have hi...

Friend vs Therapist vs LLM: Shades of Grey

The conversations with AI series brings up a single point and then compares it between different LLM engines. These types of conversations were one of the many contributing factors to my writing of " Towards Consciousness " that explores the benefits and issues of creating a conscious AI. In this scenario, I was interested in seeing how an LLM might differ from a friend or therapist on issues that may have nuanced responses or contexts. In doing so, I came up with an interesting discussion on shades of grey. My Premise: Is it a bit strange to be using an LLM as a sober second thought? Every time I walk down this path of “why use an LLM to do certain things”, I come back to the alternatives that people like to say. “Why not bring it up with a friend?” A friend typically has your back or will say whatever to support their own agenda. “A therapist?” That’s someone who is “trained” to be impartial. But a computer? A computer is impartial based on two logical outcomes. If you say ...