Skip to main content

What's in a Name?

There's a great story in the Big Moo on page 69 (actually there are a bunch of good stories on pages 1 through x) but this one stood out to me this morning.

It was about how Isaac Newton "discovered" gravity. Of course , he didn't discover it - in fact the biggest part of what he did was NAME it.

Which brings us to Avalon's renaming. Yes, I know it's been known for a while but I was listening to Buzz Out Loud (Cnet's podcast of indeterminate length) and Veronica ("I love apple above all else) commented on how she had seen the new Windows Presentation Foundation (WPF) and really liked it...except what's with the name?

In the days when people complain about Miicrosoft's ability to come up with cool names, Avalon wasn't bad but its renaming has me scratching its head. It's easy to get excited about a new operating system named "Tiger" (roar!) or , heck, even "Vista". But hey, everyone raise your hands and get excited for the brand new ......

"Windows Presentation Foundation"

Doesn't exactly send a chill through your bones....

But enough about WPF - it's only a feature right - sure it doesn't Flash right out at you - but then when was the last time a product launch sent a Zorro to Europa (or Sedna, for that matter)?

It only takes a nano-second to realize that the name game is still constantly being played. MS may feel obligated to stamp the Windows trademark name on everything, but as long as they do that, this is a game that they will always lose. Who cares, right? No one really cares about the acronyms, right - Mr. WIMPy interface - who needs a WIMP when you've got a LAMP?

"The product is what matters. "

Maybe in the minds but not in the hearts of consumers and users.

(as a side note, hotel buildings change names regularly - the hotel in Ottawa with the revolving restaurant has been the Holiday Inn, the Radisson and most recently a Marriott - when we were in Hawaii, the Hilton resort in Waikoloa was formerly the Hyatt, AND STILL referrred to as the Hyatt but the people on the Island - names DO stick!)

So as I was reading the Big Moo, I thought of Avalon and WPF and what Newton could have called gravity instead?

How about the Newton Declivity Theory? (NDT) - that would have stuck, right?

Or IEM - Isaac's Elevation Model?

What if to this day, we continued to use the old way of announcing one's self, I am Andrew, son of Donald, son of Karnac? My name isn't Andrew, I am DO2 - Donald Offspring #2. Or better yet, DO70?

It's a moot point now - as the product has already been named but there is definitely something to be said for a product to be keeping its name.

Check out the book - it's short, funny and absolutely worth every penny (and proceeds go to charity)

Meanwhile, I'm back to Europa.



Remarkabalize

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Who Wants To Be Logical? I Do! I Don't! (with Claude)

In my book, Towards Consciousness, I explore PET , a theory that attempts to explain consciousness and possibly how it might apply to AI. As part of the conversations with AI series, I've included this conversation with Claude.AI in which we were talking about something very different and yet the conversation redirected itself back to PET. For the record, there is no such thing as "Colfsity". A It's interesting to me that people want to proclaim their distinction from being rigid and unlike machines, yet they also complain that the "best" people keep a rigid schedule, regular routines and logic understanding of issues. That's a perceptive observation about a real tension in how people think about themselves and what they value. There does seem to be this paradox where rigidity is simultaneously rejected as "robotic" or inhuman, yet praised when it appears as discipline, consistency, or logical thinking. I think part of what's happening is t...

Merry Christmas

Whether you celebrate now, have already celebrated your past holiday, are planning to, or not, I hope you find yourself surrounded by family and those you love during this holiday season and are able to remember fondly those who are not with you. We often find ourselves buried in work, or too distracted by other problems, to share and remember a few moments with those closest to us. So many of us are separated by huge distances, we often find it easier to focus on those who are out of arm's reach yet so easy to connect with online, instead of those who are right beside us. So do yourself a favour, put down the keyboard (stylus, mouse, etc) and spend that time. I know I will. Merry Christmas. Powered by ScribeFire .

Comparing education systems based on their technology

(yes, I originally found this blog because of Scoble's note on it BUT it was kind of interesting all the same) Read Alex Mallet's summary of his first week at MIT. Malletrivia: Summary of the first complete week Wow - "There's an incredible amount of material packed into each lecture" - and it sounds interesting... Compared to some of the lecture content I have seen at our universities, you really must get what you pay for. While it sounds like Alex is writing frantically down notes in his classes, at least he's finding something worth writing about in them. Case in point: one of our local universities ( Carleton ) puts some lecture classes on the TV (like many universities do) - but you would think they purposely find the most boring professors to teach them. They put up PowerPoint slides with 30 points on them, speak in monotone voice (yes, imagine the typical caricature of the university lecture from years ago), tell the students to print their...