Skip to main content

Further Optimization Analysis

Calvin made a post about code optimization and noted that if you actually attempt to do a
FOR i = 1 TO num
IF wParam=ASC("a")
wParam=ASC("b")
ENDIF
ENDFOR

It would take longer than just using the direct values. So what happens if you used variables or #DEFINE statements.

I first thought "i'll use constants" , adding the following

#DEFINE cn1 ASC('a')
#DEFINE cn2 ASC('b')

and changing the logic to:
FOR i = 1 TO num
IF wParam=cn1
wParam=cn2
ENDIF
ENDFOR

The Result? A little faster but nowhere close to the performance improvements gained by using the literal values. Why? Because it is simply replacing the cn1 and c2 with the ASC('97') statements.

But even when I changed the #DEFINEs to variables and assigned the values, they still weren't improved.

The only time it came close was if I explicitly did
#DEFINE cn1 78
#DEFINE cn2 79

Here's a basic breakdown (non scientific) of my times:
With literal values: 3.781 seconds
With functions: 5.187
With variables: 5.11
With DEFINEs and Functions: 4.98 - 5 (I did run it twice)
With DEFINEs and Literals: 3.782 seconds

So the rule has to be - if you can avoid using functions and variables by using constants or the literal values, do it.

Optimization...go figure.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Who Wants To Be Logical? I Do! I Don't! (with Claude)

In my book, Towards Consciousness, I explore PET , a theory that attempts to explain consciousness and possibly how it might apply to AI. As part of the conversations with AI series, I've included this conversation with Claude.AI in which we were talking about something very different and yet the conversation redirected itself back to PET. For the record, there is no such thing as "Colfsity". A It's interesting to me that people want to proclaim their distinction from being rigid and unlike machines, yet they also complain that the "best" people keep a rigid schedule, regular routines and logic understanding of issues. That's a perceptive observation about a real tension in how people think about themselves and what they value. There does seem to be this paradox where rigidity is simultaneously rejected as "robotic" or inhuman, yet praised when it appears as discipline, consistency, or logical thinking. I think part of what's happening is t...

Merry Christmas

Whether you celebrate now, have already celebrated your past holiday, are planning to, or not, I hope you find yourself surrounded by family and those you love during this holiday season and are able to remember fondly those who are not with you. We often find ourselves buried in work, or too distracted by other problems, to share and remember a few moments with those closest to us. So many of us are separated by huge distances, we often find it easier to focus on those who are out of arm's reach yet so easy to connect with online, instead of those who are right beside us. So do yourself a favour, put down the keyboard (stylus, mouse, etc) and spend that time. I know I will. Merry Christmas. Powered by ScribeFire .

Comparing education systems based on their technology

(yes, I originally found this blog because of Scoble's note on it BUT it was kind of interesting all the same) Read Alex Mallet's summary of his first week at MIT. Malletrivia: Summary of the first complete week Wow - "There's an incredible amount of material packed into each lecture" - and it sounds interesting... Compared to some of the lecture content I have seen at our universities, you really must get what you pay for. While it sounds like Alex is writing frantically down notes in his classes, at least he's finding something worth writing about in them. Case in point: one of our local universities ( Carleton ) puts some lecture classes on the TV (like many universities do) - but you would think they purposely find the most boring professors to teach them. They put up PowerPoint slides with 30 points on them, speak in monotone voice (yes, imagine the typical caricature of the university lecture from years ago), tell the students to print their...