Skip to main content

Apprentice Finale

I was hoping for Street Smarts - but honestly, neither of these two are capable of the job. (no link, no nothing!!!!)
 
I have to say - both teams were sh*t - and Kendra did the job required. Tana couldn't do it - I actually thought she could.
 
ANd now watching the episode, OMIGOD!!!! Both of these two have no place in any organization (after watching them for the past 14 weeks) but Kendra definitely did win the job.
 
Good job.
 
 

Comments

Anonymous said…
Kendra rode under the curtains as George stated, but she got exposed for what a little snotty nose snake in the grass she can really be. The car discription book would never had been exposed if not for Tara. The Little sweet Kendra is a pro at doing this, and she showed her colors. I was shocked that Trump dismissed this underhanded action..or maybe he is just too high on his own ego to realize that its a human error we all posess...about making remarks about goof offs. Wake Up Donald...Didn't you have enough of that kind of under handed work with Katie Curic at your last wedding?
Anonymous said…
Just goes to show you, Donald is all about education and not experience. To hire an undermining, snooty girl like Kendra...I hope it falls right back in his lap. I love the show, but you knew from day one that he was going to hire the one with the education. Did he just put the street mart people on there to make him look good.....what a joke...we all know what the real Trump is all about....education, education, education.... Tana had the business know how, the personality and the drive to do a good job....all 14 weeks she got along well with everyone, no arguments, no fights, unkike Kendra who made eniemies from day one.....wake up Donald....you hired a woman finally, but again...education is all your looking at....
Anonymous said…
So Tana thought of the "circle." Who did all the work while her teammates were sleeping? I don't think Trump picked Kendra because of her education. Kendra was just plain better.

Popular posts from this blog

Elevating Project Specifications with Three Insightful ChatGPT Prompts

For developers and testers, ChatGPT, the freely accessible tool from OpenAI, is game-changing. If you want to learn a new programming language, ask for samples or have it convert your existing code. This can be done in Visual Studio Code (using GitHub CoPilot) or directly in the ChatGPT app or web site.  If you’re a tester, ChatGPT can write a test spec or actual test code (if you use Jest or Cypress) based on existing code, copied and pasted into the input area. But ChatGPT can be of huge value for analysts (whether system or business) who need to validate their needs. There’s often a disconnect between developers and analysts. Analysts complain that developers don’t build what they asked for or ask too many questions. Developers complain that analysts haven’t thought of obvious things. In these situations, ChatGPT can be a great intermediary. At its worst, it forces you to think about and then discount obvious issues. At best, it clarifies the needs into documented requirements. ...

Blogs and RSS come to Microsoft.com

MS has just introduced their portal and it's pretty comprehensive. Nothing quite like learning that some people use AIM instead of MSN messenger, or that there really may be a need for supporting 4 monitors ( Cyrus Complains ) However, it's really a great sign that MS is serious about supporting the blogging community which seems to have um, exploded in size in the past year. Blogs and RSS come to Microsoft.com

I’m Supposed to Know

https://programmingzen.com/im-supposed-to-know/ Great post for developers who are struggling with unrealistic expectations of what they should know and what they shouldn't. Thirty-forty years ago, it was possible to know a lot about a certain environment - that environment was MS-DOS (for non Mac/UNIX systems). . There was pretty much only a handful of ways to get things going. Enter networking. That added a new wrinkle to how systems worked. Networks back then were finicky. One of my first jobs was working on a 3COM + LAN and it then migrated to LAN Manager. Enter Windows or the graphical user interface. The best depiction of the complexity Windows (OS/2, Windows NT, etc) introduced that I recall was by Charles Petzold (if memory serves) at a local user group meeting. He invited a bunch of people on the stage and then acted as the Windows "Colonel", a nice play on kernel. Each person had a role but to complete their job they always had to pass things back to h...