Skip to main content

Apprentice Finale

I was hoping for Street Smarts - but honestly, neither of these two are capable of the job. (no link, no nothing!!!!)
 
I have to say - both teams were sh*t - and Kendra did the job required. Tana couldn't do it - I actually thought she could.
 
ANd now watching the episode, OMIGOD!!!! Both of these two have no place in any organization (after watching them for the past 14 weeks) but Kendra definitely did win the job.
 
Good job.
 
 

Comments

Anonymous said…
Kendra rode under the curtains as George stated, but she got exposed for what a little snotty nose snake in the grass she can really be. The car discription book would never had been exposed if not for Tara. The Little sweet Kendra is a pro at doing this, and she showed her colors. I was shocked that Trump dismissed this underhanded action..or maybe he is just too high on his own ego to realize that its a human error we all posess...about making remarks about goof offs. Wake Up Donald...Didn't you have enough of that kind of under handed work with Katie Curic at your last wedding?
May 19, 2005 at 11:45 PM
Anonymous said…
Just goes to show you, Donald is all about education and not experience. To hire an undermining, snooty girl like Kendra...I hope it falls right back in his lap. I love the show, but you knew from day one that he was going to hire the one with the education. Did he just put the street mart people on there to make him look good.....what a joke...we all know what the real Trump is all about....education, education, education.... Tana had the business know how, the personality and the drive to do a good job....all 14 weeks she got along well with everyone, no arguments, no fights, unkike Kendra who made eniemies from day one.....wake up Donald....you hired a woman finally, but again...education is all your looking at....
May 20, 2005 at 10:43 AM
Anonymous said…
So Tana thought of the "circle." Who did all the work while her teammates were sleeping? I don't think Trump picked Kendra because of her education. Kendra was just plain better.
May 20, 2005 at 2:45 PM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Elevating Project Specifications with Three Insightful ChatGPT Prompts

For developers and testers, ChatGPT, the freely accessible tool from OpenAI, is game-changing. If you want to learn a new programming language, ask for samples or have it convert your existing code. This can be done in Visual Studio Code (using GitHub CoPilot) or directly in the ChatGPT app or web site.  If you’re a tester, ChatGPT can write a test spec or actual test code (if you use Jest or Cypress) based on existing code, copied and pasted into the input area. But ChatGPT can be of huge value for analysts (whether system or business) who need to validate their needs. There’s often a disconnect between developers and analysts. Analysts complain that developers don’t build what they asked for or ask too many questions. Developers complain that analysts haven’t thought of obvious things. In these situations, ChatGPT can be a great intermediary. At its worst, it forces you to think about and then discount obvious issues. At best, it clarifies the needs into documented requirements. ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Respect

Respect is something humans give to each other through personal connection. It’s the bond that forms when we recognize something—or someone—as significant, relatable, or worthy of care. This connection doesn’t have to be limited to people. There was an  article  recently that described the differing attitudes towards AI tools such as ChatGPT and Google Gemini (formerly Bard). Some people treat them like a standard search while others form a sort of personal relationship — being courteous, saying “please” and “thank you”. Occasionally, people share extra details unrelated to their question, like, ‘I’m going to a wedding. What flower goes well with a tuxedo?’ Does an AI “care” how you respond to it? Of course not — it reflects the patterns it’s trained on. Yet our interaction shapes how these tools evolve, and that influence is something we should take seriously. Most of us have all expressed frustration when an AI “hallucinates”. Real or not, the larger issue is that we have hi...
Post a Comment
Read more

When A Machine Starts To Care

“Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic.” Arthur C. Clarke (1962)  I first used that quote when I was starting out in the tech industry. Back then, it was a way to illustrate just how fast and powerful computers had become. Querying large datasets in seconds felt magical—at least to those who didn’t build them.  Today, we’re facing something even more extraordinary. Large Language Models (LLMs) can now carry on conversations that approach human-level fluency. Clarke’s quote applies again. And just as importantly, many researchers argue that LLMs meet—or at least brush up against—the criteria of the Turing Test.  We tend to criticize LLMs for their “hallucinations,” their sometimes-confident inaccuracies. But let’s be honest: we also complain when our friends misremember facts or recount things inaccurately. This doesn’t excuse LLMs—it simply highlights that the behavior isn’t entirely alien. In some ways, it mirrors our own cognitive limits....
Post a Comment
Read more