Skip to main content

VFP 9: Major SQL SELECT Enhancements

Visual FoxPro 9 includes several SQL improvements especially on the SELECT side of things. It's got neat features that already were available in SQL Server like CAST and VarChar data types but some of the fun are on the limitations that have been removed.
 
In VFP 8 and earlier, you could only do 9 joins in a SELECT statement and only with a maximum of 30 tables. With VFP 9, you're unlimited.
 
You can reference more than 30 tables or aliases in a single SELECT statement and join them as much as you want.
 
Smaller applications may not need this but as you come across more and more normalized databases, removing this limitation is huge.
 
But what's more is the other limitations that have been removed from the SQL - SELECT statement.
 
- unlimited UNION statements
- you can specify more than 24 items in an IN statement. SELECT * FROM customers where state in ("NC","AL",etc, etc). In previous versions, you had a maximum of 24. Even though this approach would call out for a better criteria, if you are allowing your users to build complex queries, this removes a lot of "why can't I? " type questions.
 
 
Perhaps even cooler is how VFP 9 really supports subqueries. Consider the following statement:
 
SELECT ordid from (select * from ordhist) as x

In previous versions, you might have to do :

SELECT * from ORDHIST where <condition> into cursor x

SELECT ordid from x

Now you can put it all into a single line.

You can also use subqueries as a line item:

SELECT custname,custno, (SELECT sum(totchgs) From frmast) as ntotal,sum(totchgs),sum(totchgs)/(SELECT sum(totchgs) From frmast)*100 as nperc From frmast GROUP BY 1,2

This query shows the customer name, the total of all invoices (in the file), the total invoices for that customer and then the percentage of total invoices that the customer held all in one query.

In earlier versions, this would be done with multiple lines but now you can do it all in one.

All of these changes are going to be a great reason to refactor your older code. One of the joys I always get is trying to reduce the size of my application. With the new SQL enhancements in Europa, it's going to be lots of fun!

Comments

Garrett said…
One very good reason for removing the limit on the IN clause is that GIS software may do queries using this syntax, which used to make it difficult to use Fox with them. I was very happy to see this change....
June 28, 2004 at 10:59 AM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Elevating Project Specifications with Three Insightful ChatGPT Prompts

For developers and testers, ChatGPT, the freely accessible tool from OpenAI, is game-changing. If you want to learn a new programming language, ask for samples or have it convert your existing code. This can be done in Visual Studio Code (using GitHub CoPilot) or directly in the ChatGPT app or web site.  If you’re a tester, ChatGPT can write a test spec or actual test code (if you use Jest or Cypress) based on existing code, copied and pasted into the input area. But ChatGPT can be of huge value for analysts (whether system or business) who need to validate their needs. There’s often a disconnect between developers and analysts. Analysts complain that developers don’t build what they asked for or ask too many questions. Developers complain that analysts haven’t thought of obvious things. In these situations, ChatGPT can be a great intermediary. At its worst, it forces you to think about and then discount obvious issues. At best, it clarifies the needs into documented requirements. ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Respect

Respect is something humans give to each other through personal connection. It’s the bond that forms when we recognize something—or someone—as significant, relatable, or worthy of care. This connection doesn’t have to be limited to people. There was an  article  recently that described the differing attitudes towards AI tools such as ChatGPT and Google Gemini (formerly Bard). Some people treat them like a standard search while others form a sort of personal relationship — being courteous, saying “please” and “thank you”. Occasionally, people share extra details unrelated to their question, like, ‘I’m going to a wedding. What flower goes well with a tuxedo?’ Does an AI “care” how you respond to it? Of course not — it reflects the patterns it’s trained on. Yet our interaction shapes how these tools evolve, and that influence is something we should take seriously. Most of us have all expressed frustration when an AI “hallucinates”. Real or not, the larger issue is that we have hi...
Post a Comment
Read more

When A Machine Starts To Care

“Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic.” Arthur C. Clarke (1962)  I first used that quote when I was starting out in the tech industry. Back then, it was a way to illustrate just how fast and powerful computers had become. Querying large datasets in seconds felt magical—at least to those who didn’t build them.  Today, we’re facing something even more extraordinary. Large Language Models (LLMs) can now carry on conversations that approach human-level fluency. Clarke’s quote applies again. And just as importantly, many researchers argue that LLMs meet—or at least brush up against—the criteria of the Turing Test.  We tend to criticize LLMs for their “hallucinations,” their sometimes-confident inaccuracies. But let’s be honest: we also complain when our friends misremember facts or recount things inaccurately. This doesn’t excuse LLMs—it simply highlights that the behavior isn’t entirely alien. In some ways, it mirrors our own cognitive limits....
Post a Comment
Read more