Skip to main content

How I Make Money On Free Software by Ted Roche

I figured Ted's comment may have been a little directed at me , from my post a while back about supporting shareware and commercial authors.

He's makes a good point: "I'm in the business of consulting, not value-added resale. " But it doesn't answer the question for those who are in the "get rich or die trying" scheme (you know who you are).

The subscription model is the one I always think about when pondering "free software". We do it at MTI (http://www.mtihorizon.com) with our e-services - give away the tool but charge per transaction. It seems to work but it takes a long time for the "bricks+mortar" type businesses to move to that approach. They are used to selling a product, as opposed to a service.

As far as I'm concerned, it's the one that makes good sense for businesses to consider. All the big box stores (costco) offer "clubs" which are in effect annual subscription services, in exchange for some benefits. Annual maintenance and licensing fees are simply forms of "subscriptions".

Once the service stops being of value, you un-subscribe. What a great way of getting the message across to the vendor: I'll give you money as long as what you have works - when it stops, I stop paying you. Kind of like consulting, I'll give you money as long as what you do gives me value.

No value -> no money : what a concept.

Great post, Ted! - Thanks

Ted's Radio Weblog

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Respect

Respect is something humans give to each other through personal connection. It’s the bond that forms when we recognize something—or someone—as significant, relatable, or worthy of care. This connection doesn’t have to be limited to people. There was an  article  recently that described the differing attitudes towards AI tools such as ChatGPT and Google Gemini (formerly Bard). Some people treat them like a standard search while others form a sort of personal relationship — being courteous, saying “please” and “thank you”. Occasionally, people share extra details unrelated to their question, like, ‘I’m going to a wedding. What flower goes well with a tuxedo?’ Does an AI “care” how you respond to it? Of course not — it reflects the patterns it’s trained on. Yet our interaction shapes how these tools evolve, and that influence is something we should take seriously. Most of us have all expressed frustration when an AI “hallucinates”. Real or not, the larger issue is that we have hi...

Elevating Project Specifications with Three Insightful ChatGPT Prompts

For developers and testers, ChatGPT, the freely accessible tool from OpenAI, is game-changing. If you want to learn a new programming language, ask for samples or have it convert your existing code. This can be done in Visual Studio Code (using GitHub CoPilot) or directly in the ChatGPT app or web site.  If you’re a tester, ChatGPT can write a test spec or actual test code (if you use Jest or Cypress) based on existing code, copied and pasted into the input area. But ChatGPT can be of huge value for analysts (whether system or business) who need to validate their needs. There’s often a disconnect between developers and analysts. Analysts complain that developers don’t build what they asked for or ask too many questions. Developers complain that analysts haven’t thought of obvious things. In these situations, ChatGPT can be a great intermediary. At its worst, it forces you to think about and then discount obvious issues. At best, it clarifies the needs into documented requirements. ...

Friend vs Therapist vs LLM: Shades of Grey

The conversations with AI series brings up a single point and then compares it between different LLM engines. These types of conversations were one of the many contributing factors to my writing of " Towards Consciousness " that explores the benefits and issues of creating a conscious AI. In this scenario, I was interested in seeing how an LLM might differ from a friend or therapist on issues that may have nuanced responses or contexts. In doing so, I came up with an interesting discussion on shades of grey. My Premise: Is it a bit strange to be using an LLM as a sober second thought? Every time I walk down this path of “why use an LLM to do certain things”, I come back to the alternatives that people like to say. “Why not bring it up with a friend?” A friend typically has your back or will say whatever to support their own agenda. “A therapist?” That’s someone who is “trained” to be impartial. But a computer? A computer is impartial based on two logical outcomes. If you say ...