Skip to main content

Using Visual FoxPro to manipulate Outlook Inbox messages

One of the Outlook Blogs made a note of a tool called QuickMailSort,
something that was supposed to organize all your emails by the Company for
each contact.

I downloaded and tried it out. Well - it didn't quite do what it said it
would do so I tossed it but said "maybe I should do it myself"

The following piece of code will run through your inbox folder and create
sub-folders for every company name in the contact file and then move the
messages in there. I use company name so that all messages from different
people at a single company can go in there. My first pass took about 15
seconds and sorted through about 1000 messages. I'm happy.

Here's the code.

** Create a link to Outlook and folders

** Note - I'm going directly against Folder names here because I have about
10 different PSTs in my Outlook configuration

lo = CREATEOBJECT("outlook.application")
loSpace = lo.GetNameSpace("MAPI")
loContacts = loSpace.Folders("Mailbox").Folders("Contacts")

loFolder = loSpace.Folders("Mailbox").Folders("Inbox")

** Go BACKWARDS through messages otherwise you won't find them.

FOR lni = loFolder.Items.Count TO 1 STEP -1
loMsg = lofolder.items(lni)

*** Yes I'm using TRY CATCH here because Outlook's Find sometimes bombs on
really big email addresses
TRY
loFind =
loContacts.Items.Find("[Email1Address]="+lomsg.SenderEmailAddress)
IF NOT ISNULL(loFind)
** I'm only moving them if they have a company
IF NOT EMPTY(loFind.CompanyName)
** We do another try here so we can create the Folder name
TRY
lo = loFolder.Folders(loFind.Companyname)
CATCH
loFolder.Folders.Add(loFind.CompanyName)
ENDTRY
loMsg.Move(loFolder.Folders(loFind.Companyname))
ENDIF
ENDIF
CATCH
** Do nothing
ENDTRY

ENDFOR
RETURN


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Elevating Project Specifications with Three Insightful ChatGPT Prompts

For developers and testers, ChatGPT, the freely accessible tool from OpenAI, is game-changing. If you want to learn a new programming language, ask for samples or have it convert your existing code. This can be done in Visual Studio Code (using GitHub CoPilot) or directly in the ChatGPT app or web site.  If you’re a tester, ChatGPT can write a test spec or actual test code (if you use Jest or Cypress) based on existing code, copied and pasted into the input area. But ChatGPT can be of huge value for analysts (whether system or business) who need to validate their needs. There’s often a disconnect between developers and analysts. Analysts complain that developers don’t build what they asked for or ask too many questions. Developers complain that analysts haven’t thought of obvious things. In these situations, ChatGPT can be a great intermediary. At its worst, it forces you to think about and then discount obvious issues. At best, it clarifies the needs into documented requirements. ...

Respect

Respect is something humans give to each other through personal connection. It’s the bond that forms when we recognize something—or someone—as significant, relatable, or worthy of care. This connection doesn’t have to be limited to people. There was an  article  recently that described the differing attitudes towards AI tools such as ChatGPT and Google Gemini (formerly Bard). Some people treat them like a standard search while others form a sort of personal relationship — being courteous, saying “please” and “thank you”. Occasionally, people share extra details unrelated to their question, like, ‘I’m going to a wedding. What flower goes well with a tuxedo?’ Does an AI “care” how you respond to it? Of course not — it reflects the patterns it’s trained on. Yet our interaction shapes how these tools evolve, and that influence is something we should take seriously. Most of us have all expressed frustration when an AI “hallucinates”. Real or not, the larger issue is that we have hi...

I’m Supposed to Know

https://programmingzen.com/im-supposed-to-know/ Great post for developers who are struggling with unrealistic expectations of what they should know and what they shouldn't. Thirty-forty years ago, it was possible to know a lot about a certain environment - that environment was MS-DOS (for non Mac/UNIX systems). . There was pretty much only a handful of ways to get things going. Enter networking. That added a new wrinkle to how systems worked. Networks back then were finicky. One of my first jobs was working on a 3COM + LAN and it then migrated to LAN Manager. Enter Windows or the graphical user interface. The best depiction of the complexity Windows (OS/2, Windows NT, etc) introduced that I recall was by Charles Petzold (if memory serves) at a local user group meeting. He invited a bunch of people on the stage and then acted as the Windows "Colonel", a nice play on kernel. Each person had a role but to complete their job they always had to pass things back to h...