Skip to main content

Converting XML to FoxPro tables


Many FoxPro developers are familiar with XMLTOCURSOR() which converts an XML file to a FoxPro cursor for review. This function works typically best with a single table in an XML file.

Unfortunately, it requires a fairly well structured XML file. For example, it can parse this XML perfectly:
<?xml version = "1.0" encoding="Windows-1252" standalone="yes"?>
<vines>
    <vine_lot>
        <id>1</id>
        <ripe_grape>4</ripe_grape>
    </vine_lot>
    <vine_lot>
        <id>2</id>
        <ripe_grape>3</ripe_grape>
    </vine_lot>
    <vine_lot>
        <id>3</id>
        <ripe_grape>3</ripe_grape>
    </vine_lot>
</vines>

Yet, it complains when trying to convert:
<?xml version = "1.0" encoding="Windows-1252" standalone="yes"?>
<vines>
     <Lot>
          <id>1</id>
           <ripe-grape>4</ripe-grape>
     </Lot>
     <Lot>
          <id>2</id>
           <ripe-grape>3</ripe-grape>
     </Lot>
     <Lot>
          <id>3</id>
           <ripe-grape>3</ripe-grape>
     </Lot>
</vines>

Now the reason may be obvious to FoxPro developers - (ripe-grape is not a valid field while ripe_grape is) - so clearly you have to be very careful when using XMLTOCURSOR.


This program (Advanced XML Converter) will take nested XML tables and create multiple DBF files with it (as well as other formats) - it also deals with these types of issues.

I tried it out because I'm always interested in handling different XML formats. I could likely transform a nested XML into a single one with an XSL but this seemed a little easier.

For those who are unsure what I mean by a nested table, here is a sample (borrowed from here):

<Vineyard>
      <Lot id="1">
           <ripe-grapes>4</ripe-grapes>
           <Picker>
                 <name>John</name>
                 <metabolism>2</metabolism>
                 <grape-wealth>20</grape-wealth>
           </Picker>
     </Lot>
<Vineyard>

In this scenario, you would see two tables: Lots and Pickers.

Advanced XML Converter saw this and when I saved it as "Vine" it created two DBF files: Vine_Lots and Vine_pickers.

Unfortunately, what it missed was the relationship between Lots and Pickers.

I would have expected to see an foreign key in Pickers that would link it back to Lot. Unfortunately, it missed this relationship. To get it to work properly, I had to do:

<Vineyard>
      <Lot id="1">
           <ripe-grapes>4</ripe-grapes>
           <Picker id="2">
               <lot>1</lot>
                 <name>John</name>
                 <metabolism>2</metabolism>
                 <grape-wealth>20</grape-wealth>
           </Picker>
     </Lot>

Which defeats the purpose of the nested XML.

It's too bad - because it did a great job in other areas. Still, might be worth a look if you're looking to at least see what's up with it.

Here's my list of ERs:
1) properly handle relationships
2) build an XSL that will do the conversion for you automatically

Of course, that's not necessarily its purpose - it's more for data crunchers but without the relationship support for nested XML, it is lacking it.

Do you know of a tool that can do this? (either from a command line or others)


Software can turn raw data into structured text., HiBase Group

Powered by ScribeFire.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Elevating Project Specifications with Three Insightful ChatGPT Prompts

For developers and testers, ChatGPT, the freely accessible tool from OpenAI, is game-changing. If you want to learn a new programming language, ask for samples or have it convert your existing code. This can be done in Visual Studio Code (using GitHub CoPilot) or directly in the ChatGPT app or web site.  If you’re a tester, ChatGPT can write a test spec or actual test code (if you use Jest or Cypress) based on existing code, copied and pasted into the input area. But ChatGPT can be of huge value for analysts (whether system or business) who need to validate their needs. There’s often a disconnect between developers and analysts. Analysts complain that developers don’t build what they asked for or ask too many questions. Developers complain that analysts haven’t thought of obvious things. In these situations, ChatGPT can be a great intermediary. At its worst, it forces you to think about and then discount obvious issues. At best, it clarifies the needs into documented requirements. ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Respect

Respect is something humans give to each other through personal connection. It’s the bond that forms when we recognize something—or someone—as significant, relatable, or worthy of care. This connection doesn’t have to be limited to people. There was an  article  recently that described the differing attitudes towards AI tools such as ChatGPT and Google Gemini (formerly Bard). Some people treat them like a standard search while others form a sort of personal relationship — being courteous, saying “please” and “thank you”. Occasionally, people share extra details unrelated to their question, like, ‘I’m going to a wedding. What flower goes well with a tuxedo?’ Does an AI “care” how you respond to it? Of course not — it reflects the patterns it’s trained on. Yet our interaction shapes how these tools evolve, and that influence is something we should take seriously. Most of us have all expressed frustration when an AI “hallucinates”. Real or not, the larger issue is that we have hi...
Post a Comment
Read more

I’m Supposed to Know

https://programmingzen.com/im-supposed-to-know/ Great post for developers who are struggling with unrealistic expectations of what they should know and what they shouldn't. Thirty-forty years ago, it was possible to know a lot about a certain environment - that environment was MS-DOS (for non Mac/UNIX systems). . There was pretty much only a handful of ways to get things going. Enter networking. That added a new wrinkle to how systems worked. Networks back then were finicky. One of my first jobs was working on a 3COM + LAN and it then migrated to LAN Manager. Enter Windows or the graphical user interface. The best depiction of the complexity Windows (OS/2, Windows NT, etc) introduced that I recall was by Charles Petzold (if memory serves) at a local user group meeting. He invited a bunch of people on the stage and then acted as the Windows "Colonel", a nice play on kernel. Each person had a role but to complete their job they always had to pass things back to h...
Post a Comment
Read more