Who is this Frank Fischer, MS .NET evangelist of Microsoft Germany, anyway?
I found this by doing a technorati search for FoxPro - this was on the first page - obviously they are pinging the right blogs if something from 2004 was listed on the first page.
The Fox Team should do something about MS "evangelists" spreading their words. While Ken and everyone else is stepping away from declaring Sedna a "release", this guy actually says:
* Q: What about Foxpro ?
* R: We are forced by customers to maintain it. We have an eight-year commitment to maintenance. But don't move to it: it's a dead-end. Use VS instead.
(of course, he's a DotNet evangelist but he could have worded it a bit better).
Interesting comment though: Until Longhorn, .NET is built on top of COM. Starting with Longhorn, the building direction is reversed: COM has been rebuilt on top of .NET
Tag: FoxPro
Microsoft talks to Paradox developers - Riff Blog
I found this by doing a technorati search for FoxPro - this was on the first page - obviously they are pinging the right blogs if something from 2004 was listed on the first page.
The Fox Team should do something about MS "evangelists" spreading their words. While Ken and everyone else is stepping away from declaring Sedna a "release", this guy actually says:
* Q: What about Foxpro ?
* R: We are forced by customers to maintain it. We have an eight-year commitment to maintenance. But don't move to it: it's a dead-end. Use VS instead.
(of course, he's a DotNet evangelist but he could have worded it a bit better).
Interesting comment though: Until Longhorn, .NET is built on top of COM. Starting with Longhorn, the building direction is reversed: COM has been rebuilt on top of .NET
Tag: FoxPro
Microsoft talks to Paradox developers - Riff Blog
Comments
Also, as you can imagine, at a meeting of Paradox developers just trying to figure how they would recover from XP SP2 partially breaking Paradox, everyone was rather irate at MS and its two products competing (for want of a better word) against Paradox being themselves not broken by the same SP2.
From him, mentioning this 8 year commitment (although reading you it appears to have been 9 years at the time) was a valuable point to make to Paradox users, who are rather left in the blue by Corel about the future of their beloved IDE. But of course ... switching to VS.NET was the preach of the day.
But frankly, I don't begrudge him: it was a nice effort to try and meet such an audience for MS.
And it may simply be the way the original post read.
Thanks for the comments and you're right - it was good of MS to try and talk to the "non-converted"
Quite impressive for a US/Canadian publisher like Corel.
Fox does not seems to be in the same quagmire, even if it is not central to MS product lineup.
Consider these stats - Fox use in europe and Asia abounds when compared to the US.