Skip to main content

Updated: A Microsoft evangelist talks to Paradox developers (in 2004) and rips FoxPro

Who is this Frank Fischer, MS .NET evangelist of Microsoft Germany, anyway?

I found this by doing a technorati search for FoxPro - this was on the first page - obviously they are pinging the right blogs if something from 2004 was listed on the first page.

The Fox Team should do something about MS "evangelists" spreading their words. While Ken and everyone else is stepping away from declaring Sedna a "release", this guy actually says:

* Q: What about Foxpro ?
* R: We are forced by customers to maintain it. We have an eight-year commitment to maintenance. But don't move to it: it's a dead-end. Use VS instead.

(of course, he's a DotNet evangelist but he could have worded it a bit better).

Interesting comment though: Until Longhorn, .NET is built on top of COM. Starting with Longhorn, the building direction is reversed: COM has been rebuilt on top of .NET


Tag: FoxPro

Microsoft talks to Paradox developers - Riff Blog

Comments

Anonymous said…
I wouldn't say he "ripped" Foxpro: this guy seemed mostly enthusiastic about spreading the .NET word as the überanswer to anything, even Microsoftian.

Also, as you can imagine, at a meeting of Paradox developers just trying to figure how they would recover from XP SP2 partially breaking Paradox, everyone was rather irate at MS and its two products competing (for want of a better word) against Paradox being themselves not broken by the same SP2.

From him, mentioning this 8 year commitment (although reading you it appears to have been 9 years at the time) was a valuable point to make to Paradox users, who are rather left in the blue by Corel about the future of their beloved IDE. But of course ... switching to VS.NET was the preach of the day.

But frankly, I don't begrudge him: it was a nice effort to try and meet such an audience for MS.
July 2, 2005 at 6:28 PM
Andrew MacNeill said…
I can certainly appreciate how Paradox developments must feel...my daughter had to do a university assignment that required Paradox- do you THINK we could find a copy? (no way - had to redo it in an open source tool instead)

And it may simply be the way the original post read.

Thanks for the comments and you're right - it was good of MS to try and talk to the "non-converted"
July 3, 2005 at 7:14 AM
Anonymous said…
This is certainly something that may cause hilarity somewhere within MS: although Paradox is still actually available, at least in part of the EMEA region, it seems to be almost impossible to buy in the US and Canada: although we are located in France, I've had requests for it from both US and canadian buyers.

Quite impressive for a US/Canadian publisher like Corel.

Fox does not seems to be in the same quagmire, even if it is not central to MS product lineup.
July 3, 2005 at 5:00 PM
Andrew MacNeill said…
Note quite in that quagmire - but close.

Consider these stats - Fox use in europe and Asia abounds when compared to the US.
July 4, 2005 at 8:12 AM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Elevating Project Specifications with Three Insightful ChatGPT Prompts

For developers and testers, ChatGPT, the freely accessible tool from OpenAI, is game-changing. If you want to learn a new programming language, ask for samples or have it convert your existing code. This can be done in Visual Studio Code (using GitHub CoPilot) or directly in the ChatGPT app or web site.  If you’re a tester, ChatGPT can write a test spec or actual test code (if you use Jest or Cypress) based on existing code, copied and pasted into the input area. But ChatGPT can be of huge value for analysts (whether system or business) who need to validate their needs. There’s often a disconnect between developers and analysts. Analysts complain that developers don’t build what they asked for or ask too many questions. Developers complain that analysts haven’t thought of obvious things. In these situations, ChatGPT can be a great intermediary. At its worst, it forces you to think about and then discount obvious issues. At best, it clarifies the needs into documented requirements. ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Respect

Respect is something humans give to each other through personal connection. It’s the bond that forms when we recognize something—or someone—as significant, relatable, or worthy of care. This connection doesn’t have to be limited to people. There was an  article  recently that described the differing attitudes towards AI tools such as ChatGPT and Google Gemini (formerly Bard). Some people treat them like a standard search while others form a sort of personal relationship — being courteous, saying “please” and “thank you”. Occasionally, people share extra details unrelated to their question, like, ‘I’m going to a wedding. What flower goes well with a tuxedo?’ Does an AI “care” how you respond to it? Of course not — it reflects the patterns it’s trained on. Yet our interaction shapes how these tools evolve, and that influence is something we should take seriously. Most of us have all expressed frustration when an AI “hallucinates”. Real or not, the larger issue is that we have hi...
Post a Comment
Read more

When A Machine Starts To Care

“Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic.” Arthur C. Clarke (1962)  I first used that quote when I was starting out in the tech industry. Back then, it was a way to illustrate just how fast and powerful computers had become. Querying large datasets in seconds felt magical—at least to those who didn’t build them.  Today, we’re facing something even more extraordinary. Large Language Models (LLMs) can now carry on conversations that approach human-level fluency. Clarke’s quote applies again. And just as importantly, many researchers argue that LLMs meet—or at least brush up against—the criteria of the Turing Test.  We tend to criticize LLMs for their “hallucinations,” their sometimes-confident inaccuracies. But let’s be honest: we also complain when our friends misremember facts or recount things inaccurately. This doesn’t excuse LLMs—it simply highlights that the behavior isn’t entirely alien. In some ways, it mirrors our own cognitive limits....
Post a Comment
Read more