Skip to main content

Bit by a 7 year old Internet Explorer bug, er, feature

I arrived on the client's floor and didn't even have a chance to walk into the office.
"Stop everything - we need to solve this problem"

Sounds serious.

After deploying an existing ASP.Net application to a new server, a basic run-through test is typically done, making sure that everything is working. This time, however, nothing would work. The site would load, but as soon as the user did anything, it would return them to the launch page. We tried a different site and it worked fine. So it must be the configuration of IIS --- that was the general consensus.

What was happening was that the session variables used in the application were simply not being registered. So if you issued a Session("Variable") = "Andrew", it didn't error out but it also didn't set the variable.

But it wasn't. The kicker came when we installed Chrome and tried the site - it worked fine!
Now, I'm a big fan of browsers but I don't think the solution to a problem is always "switch to ...." (unless it's IE 6).

StackOverflow to the rescue - I found this link - which seemed to describe the problem - "ie8-does-not-keep-session-variables".

Then in the comments was this innocent little note:
Blocking cookies when the host contains underscores is a known issue in IE. support.microsoft.com/kb/316112– EricLaw -MSFT- May 27 '11 at 20:03



As it turns out, it's not just a "known issue", according to the KB article:
"A potential security vulnerability exists in Internet Explorer versions 5.5 and 6.0 in which a malicious user could create a URL that allows a Web site to gain unauthorized access to cookies that are stored on a client computer and then (potentially) modify the values that are contained in these cookies."

IE 5.5 and 6 --- the actual KB article is from 2005.  So it must have been fixed, right? It seems kind of strange that every other browser doesn't have this issue, except ----


STATUS

This behavior is by design.


The problem? The testing server was named with an underscore in it.

The workaround:
To work around this problem, use one of the following methods:
  • Rename the domain name and the server name, and use only alphanumeric characters.
  • Browse to the server by using the Internet Protocol (IP) address rather than the domain/server name.

Renaming the server name is something that every sys admin loves to do.

Thankfully, the testing could proceed with the IP address.

This is the first time I've ever come across this problem - but then again, I don't typically name servers with an underscore in it. But having been bit once, you can bet I'll be on the lookout.

What old bugs have you been bitten by?


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Elevating Project Specifications with Three Insightful ChatGPT Prompts

For developers and testers, ChatGPT, the freely accessible tool from OpenAI, is game-changing. If you want to learn a new programming language, ask for samples or have it convert your existing code. This can be done in Visual Studio Code (using GitHub CoPilot) or directly in the ChatGPT app or web site.  If you’re a tester, ChatGPT can write a test spec or actual test code (if you use Jest or Cypress) based on existing code, copied and pasted into the input area. But ChatGPT can be of huge value for analysts (whether system or business) who need to validate their needs. There’s often a disconnect between developers and analysts. Analysts complain that developers don’t build what they asked for or ask too many questions. Developers complain that analysts haven’t thought of obvious things. In these situations, ChatGPT can be a great intermediary. At its worst, it forces you to think about and then discount obvious issues. At best, it clarifies the needs into documented requirements. ...

Blogs and RSS come to Microsoft.com

MS has just introduced their portal and it's pretty comprehensive. Nothing quite like learning that some people use AIM instead of MSN messenger, or that there really may be a need for supporting 4 monitors ( Cyrus Complains ) However, it's really a great sign that MS is serious about supporting the blogging community which seems to have um, exploded in size in the past year. Blogs and RSS come to Microsoft.com

I’m Supposed to Know

https://programmingzen.com/im-supposed-to-know/ Great post for developers who are struggling with unrealistic expectations of what they should know and what they shouldn't. Thirty-forty years ago, it was possible to know a lot about a certain environment - that environment was MS-DOS (for non Mac/UNIX systems). . There was pretty much only a handful of ways to get things going. Enter networking. That added a new wrinkle to how systems worked. Networks back then were finicky. One of my first jobs was working on a 3COM + LAN and it then migrated to LAN Manager. Enter Windows or the graphical user interface. The best depiction of the complexity Windows (OS/2, Windows NT, etc) introduced that I recall was by Charles Petzold (if memory serves) at a local user group meeting. He invited a bunch of people on the stage and then acted as the Windows "Colonel", a nice play on kernel. Each person had a role but to complete their job they always had to pass things back to h...