Skip to main content

April Fool's and VFP

OK - I hope everyone had a blast yesterday with the various jokes that went around although I have to say I think Doug's hit a little too close to home.  Before I read his, I was even tempted to post one that said "Microsoft was giving up on Visual Basic and introducing a USE statement into Visual C#". But after seeing his (the clincher was the WSYP feature), I figured I would stay out of it.

I always think of the best April fool's jokes as having a few qualities:

1) Possible yet extremely unlikely
2) Ludicrous expectations (as in with Virgle)
3) Absolutely no way no how (as with the Google Flush for WiFi)

Even Craig Bailey's old one (that wasn't posted on April 1) did make me think (along the above lines).

But I could see a lot of people looking at Doug's post thinking it was the truth without thinking of the actual date, especially since he announced Stonefield Query 3.2 was released right after that. 

Why? Well, even though most of us are pretty clear on the fact that MS won't be doing a VFP 10, there are a lot of people who still think that if we push hard enough, they will (note: they won't).

He definitely got a lot of people with it.

Then when you go skulking around, you find from Tod that FoxPro a Big Hit in China

That's not really "new" news (read his comments for more details on it) - but it is interesting when you think of the huge interest and following VFP has around Europe and Asia.

In the world-wide VFP community, there is still a lot to do. We may have slipped to #19 on the TIOBE index but we're still in the top 20 and we haven't really started to really push on what's possible with VFP X (to say nothing of Craig Boyd's ambitious VFP Studio project).

We may never be able to get MS to reconsider a VFP 10 - but that doesn't mean we shouldn't keep trying to show that FoxPro can compete in a DotNet, 2GB+ world in its current (and future VFPX) forms, not as a dying tool but as a tool that can hold its own.
Labels:

Comments

Doug Hennig said…
There were two giveaways in my blog post: the WSYP link and "They expect to release VFP 10 on this day next year". I debated making it even more obvious, but my favorite April Fool's jokes are the ones that are possible yet if you think about them, you get the joke. IOW, at least slightly subtle.
April 2, 2008 at 11:14 AM
Andrew MacNeill said…
I missed that other one ("this day next year").

They were pretty good if a little close to home
April 2, 2008 at 12:29 PM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Elevating Project Specifications with Three Insightful ChatGPT Prompts

For developers and testers, ChatGPT, the freely accessible tool from OpenAI, is game-changing. If you want to learn a new programming language, ask for samples or have it convert your existing code. This can be done in Visual Studio Code (using GitHub CoPilot) or directly in the ChatGPT app or web site.  If you’re a tester, ChatGPT can write a test spec or actual test code (if you use Jest or Cypress) based on existing code, copied and pasted into the input area. But ChatGPT can be of huge value for analysts (whether system or business) who need to validate their needs. There’s often a disconnect between developers and analysts. Analysts complain that developers don’t build what they asked for or ask too many questions. Developers complain that analysts haven’t thought of obvious things. In these situations, ChatGPT can be a great intermediary. At its worst, it forces you to think about and then discount obvious issues. At best, it clarifies the needs into documented requirements. ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Respect

Respect is something humans give to each other through personal connection. It’s the bond that forms when we recognize something—or someone—as significant, relatable, or worthy of care. This connection doesn’t have to be limited to people. There was an  article  recently that described the differing attitudes towards AI tools such as ChatGPT and Google Gemini (formerly Bard). Some people treat them like a standard search while others form a sort of personal relationship — being courteous, saying “please” and “thank you”. Occasionally, people share extra details unrelated to their question, like, ‘I’m going to a wedding. What flower goes well with a tuxedo?’ Does an AI “care” how you respond to it? Of course not — it reflects the patterns it’s trained on. Yet our interaction shapes how these tools evolve, and that influence is something we should take seriously. Most of us have all expressed frustration when an AI “hallucinates”. Real or not, the larger issue is that we have hi...
Post a Comment
Read more

When A Machine Starts To Care

“Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic.” Arthur C. Clarke (1962)  I first used that quote when I was starting out in the tech industry. Back then, it was a way to illustrate just how fast and powerful computers had become. Querying large datasets in seconds felt magical—at least to those who didn’t build them.  Today, we’re facing something even more extraordinary. Large Language Models (LLMs) can now carry on conversations that approach human-level fluency. Clarke’s quote applies again. And just as importantly, many researchers argue that LLMs meet—or at least brush up against—the criteria of the Turing Test.  We tend to criticize LLMs for their “hallucinations,” their sometimes-confident inaccuracies. But let’s be honest: we also complain when our friends misremember facts or recount things inaccurately. This doesn’t excuse LLMs—it simply highlights that the behavior isn’t entirely alien. In some ways, it mirrors our own cognitive limits....
Post a Comment
Read more