Skip to main content

Working with VFPX and CodePlex Source Control

Many developers who want to get involved with VFPX face a bit of a challenge, especially if they've never used Source Control. (What!?!?! You've never used source control)

When I started working on the Code Analyst, I used the SCCI provider within VFP but it always conflicted with my own SSC tool (SourceOffSite). There's also a TeamPrise Explorer or one built directly into Visual Studio but within VFP, I wanted something a little more, um, basic.

So there's a CodePlex SC command line click, that's really easy to work with.  I'm still experimenting with it - but in the end, I think it may be the way to go. One thing to realize though is that it will give you FULL access to the VFPX project, which includes LOTS of sub-projects. I only wanted to work on the Code Analyst but as a result, I ended up getting everything. I don't think that's a bad thing because it makes it easier to really appreciate the entire scope of the VFPX project. After all, this IS the future of Visual FoxPro.

It's useful to read the post below because as it explains the Command Line client works in a different mode than what you may be used to with Visual Source Safe ( I believe however it's closer in nature to other approaches).  From the introduction on the site, Source Safe and Team System operate on a "checkout-edit-checkin" approach whereas CodePlex client works in a "edit-merge-commit" approach. For VFP developers, this might actually work out better.

My big problem with using Visual Studio is that for some reason, it's gotten confused and thinks that SourceSafe is my ONLY client and thus I can't connect to the CodePlex team system. In addition, if you're pretty much living in VFP, why do you really want a 400 MB client (for the Team Explorer ALONE) when you're used to working with the relatively small development IDE of VFP (150 MB).

CodePlex Source Control Client - Home

To maintain compatibility with the "checkin/checkout" style approach, you may want to run DO HOME()+"SCCTEXT" WITH <filename> every now and then to make sure the SCA, VCA,MNA files are running, although for the record, I noticed that some of the projects do NOT include those pieces in there.

What tools are you using for working with CodePlex? If there's enough need, it might be worthwhile to create a little VFP wrapper for this little gem.
Labels:

Comments

Anonymous said…
Thanks a lot for this post Andrew. I hope to try this soon.

Cesar
May 19, 2008 at 10:06 AM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Elevating Project Specifications with Three Insightful ChatGPT Prompts

For developers and testers, ChatGPT, the freely accessible tool from OpenAI, is game-changing. If you want to learn a new programming language, ask for samples or have it convert your existing code. This can be done in Visual Studio Code (using GitHub CoPilot) or directly in the ChatGPT app or web site.  If you’re a tester, ChatGPT can write a test spec or actual test code (if you use Jest or Cypress) based on existing code, copied and pasted into the input area. But ChatGPT can be of huge value for analysts (whether system or business) who need to validate their needs. There’s often a disconnect between developers and analysts. Analysts complain that developers don’t build what they asked for or ask too many questions. Developers complain that analysts haven’t thought of obvious things. In these situations, ChatGPT can be a great intermediary. At its worst, it forces you to think about and then discount obvious issues. At best, it clarifies the needs into documented requirements. ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Respect

Respect is something humans give to each other through personal connection. It’s the bond that forms when we recognize something—or someone—as significant, relatable, or worthy of care. This connection doesn’t have to be limited to people. There was an  article  recently that described the differing attitudes towards AI tools such as ChatGPT and Google Gemini (formerly Bard). Some people treat them like a standard search while others form a sort of personal relationship — being courteous, saying “please” and “thank you”. Occasionally, people share extra details unrelated to their question, like, ‘I’m going to a wedding. What flower goes well with a tuxedo?’ Does an AI “care” how you respond to it? Of course not — it reflects the patterns it’s trained on. Yet our interaction shapes how these tools evolve, and that influence is something we should take seriously. Most of us have all expressed frustration when an AI “hallucinates”. Real or not, the larger issue is that we have hi...
Post a Comment
Read more

Friend vs Therapist vs LLM: Shades of Grey

The conversations with AI series brings up a single point and then compares it between different LLM engines. These types of conversations were one of the many contributing factors to my writing of " Towards Consciousness " that explores the benefits and issues of creating a conscious AI. In this scenario, I was interested in seeing how an LLM might differ from a friend or therapist on issues that may have nuanced responses or contexts. In doing so, I came up with an interesting discussion on shades of grey. My Premise: Is it a bit strange to be using an LLM as a sober second thought? Every time I walk down this path of “why use an LLM to do certain things”, I come back to the alternatives that people like to say. “Why not bring it up with a friend?” A friend typically has your back or will say whatever to support their own agenda. “A therapist?” That’s someone who is “trained” to be impartial. But a computer? A computer is impartial based on two logical outcomes. If you say ...
Post a Comment
Read more