Skip to main content

Working with VFPX and CodePlex Source Control

Many developers who want to get involved with VFPX face a bit of a challenge, especially if they've never used Source Control. (What!?!?! You've never used source control)

When I started working on the Code Analyst, I used the SCCI provider within VFP but it always conflicted with my own SSC tool (SourceOffSite). There's also a TeamPrise Explorer or one built directly into Visual Studio but within VFP, I wanted something a little more, um, basic.

So there's a CodePlex SC command line click, that's really easy to work with.  I'm still experimenting with it - but in the end, I think it may be the way to go. One thing to realize though is that it will give you FULL access to the VFPX project, which includes LOTS of sub-projects. I only wanted to work on the Code Analyst but as a result, I ended up getting everything. I don't think that's a bad thing because it makes it easier to really appreciate the entire scope of the VFPX project. After all, this IS the future of Visual FoxPro.

It's useful to read the post below because as it explains the Command Line client works in a different mode than what you may be used to with Visual Source Safe ( I believe however it's closer in nature to other approaches).  From the introduction on the site, Source Safe and Team System operate on a "checkout-edit-checkin" approach whereas CodePlex client works in a "edit-merge-commit" approach. For VFP developers, this might actually work out better.

My big problem with using Visual Studio is that for some reason, it's gotten confused and thinks that SourceSafe is my ONLY client and thus I can't connect to the CodePlex team system. In addition, if you're pretty much living in VFP, why do you really want a 400 MB client (for the Team Explorer ALONE) when you're used to working with the relatively small development IDE of VFP (150 MB).

CodePlex Source Control Client - Home

To maintain compatibility with the "checkin/checkout" style approach, you may want to run DO HOME()+"SCCTEXT" WITH <filename> every now and then to make sure the SCA, VCA,MNA files are running, although for the record, I noticed that some of the projects do NOT include those pieces in there.

What tools are you using for working with CodePlex? If there's enough need, it might be worthwhile to create a little VFP wrapper for this little gem.

Comments

Anonymous said…
Thanks a lot for this post Andrew. I hope to try this soon.

Cesar

Popular posts from this blog

Blogs and RSS come to Microsoft.com

MS has just introduced their portal and it's pretty comprehensive. Nothing quite like learning that some people use AIM instead of MSN messenger, or that there really may be a need for supporting 4 monitors ( Cyrus Complains ) However, it's really a great sign that MS is serious about supporting the blogging community which seems to have um, exploded in size in the past year. Blogs and RSS come to Microsoft.com

Elevating Project Specifications with Three Insightful ChatGPT Prompts

For developers and testers, ChatGPT, the freely accessible tool from OpenAI, is game-changing. If you want to learn a new programming language, ask for samples or have it convert your existing code. This can be done in Visual Studio Code (using GitHub CoPilot) or directly in the ChatGPT app or web site.  If you’re a tester, ChatGPT can write a test spec or actual test code (if you use Jest or Cypress) based on existing code, copied and pasted into the input area. But ChatGPT can be of huge value for analysts (whether system or business) who need to validate their needs. There’s often a disconnect between developers and analysts. Analysts complain that developers don’t build what they asked for or ask too many questions. Developers complain that analysts haven’t thought of obvious things. In these situations, ChatGPT can be a great intermediary. At its worst, it forces you to think about and then discount obvious issues. At best, it clarifies the needs into documented requirements. ...

Programmers vs. Developers vs. Architects

I received an email this morning from Brandon Savage 's newsletter. Brandon's a PHP guru (works at Mozilla) but his newsletter and books have some great overall perspectives for developers of all languages. However, this last one (What's the difference between developers and architects?) kind of rubs me the wrong way. Either that, or I've just missed the natural inflation of job descriptions. (maybe, it's like the change in terminology between Garbage man and Waste Engineer or Secretary and Office Administrator) So maybe it's just me - but I think there's still a big difference between Programmer, Developer and then of course, architect. The key thing here is that every role has a different perspective and every one of those perspectives has value. The original MSF create roles like Product Manager, Program Manager, Developer, Tester, etc - so every concept may pigeon hole people into different roles. But the statements Brandon makes are often distinction...