Skip to main content

Runtime Coverage - another VFP 9 Rocks Feature!

Yesterday, I came across another reason why VFP 9 totally rocks above older versions.

I've been aware of it for a while but it struck me at once as to how useful this is, especially at customer sites.

SET COVERAGE TO lets you track how long each line of code is taking. It's used by the VFP Coverage Profiler for both seeing how much of your code you are using and how long it takes.

SET COVERAGE TO xxx.LOG turns it on and outputs all code execution to xxx.log
SET COVERAGE TO turns it off.

In VFP 8 and earlier, you had to be running the Development version of VFP to see the results. This has its problems - as usually, the problems never seem to occur on the Developer's machine but on the end-user's machine.

In VFP 9, however, you can issue a SET COVERAGE TO statement and it will start logging the code even in runtime!

This became extremely valuable yesterday when we were debugging a program that was running as a Windows XP service. It would stop running and we couldn't figure out why. Instead of just providing additional logging messages and overbloating the code - I issued a SET COVERAGE TO in one of the programming hooks I had put into the code and voila! instant access as to what was running and when.

You wouldn't want to do this on a regular basis - running with COVERAGE turned on can create a very large file in a matter of seconds - so be sure to turn it off. But what a benefit to have at the right time!

I also used it earlier this week to track down some performance problems that only seemed to be happening at a customer site. Many times, developers think of debugging tools as to be only accessible within the IDE. Thankfully, in VFP 9, your code can be covered just about wherever it needs to be.



powered by performancing firefox

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Elevating Project Specifications with Three Insightful ChatGPT Prompts

For developers and testers, ChatGPT, the freely accessible tool from OpenAI, is game-changing. If you want to learn a new programming language, ask for samples or have it convert your existing code. This can be done in Visual Studio Code (using GitHub CoPilot) or directly in the ChatGPT app or web site.  If you’re a tester, ChatGPT can write a test spec or actual test code (if you use Jest or Cypress) based on existing code, copied and pasted into the input area. But ChatGPT can be of huge value for analysts (whether system or business) who need to validate their needs. There’s often a disconnect between developers and analysts. Analysts complain that developers don’t build what they asked for or ask too many questions. Developers complain that analysts haven’t thought of obvious things. In these situations, ChatGPT can be a great intermediary. At its worst, it forces you to think about and then discount obvious issues. At best, it clarifies the needs into documented requirements. ...

Blogs and RSS come to Microsoft.com

MS has just introduced their portal and it's pretty comprehensive. Nothing quite like learning that some people use AIM instead of MSN messenger, or that there really may be a need for supporting 4 monitors ( Cyrus Complains ) However, it's really a great sign that MS is serious about supporting the blogging community which seems to have um, exploded in size in the past year. Blogs and RSS come to Microsoft.com

I’m Supposed to Know

https://programmingzen.com/im-supposed-to-know/ Great post for developers who are struggling with unrealistic expectations of what they should know and what they shouldn't. Thirty-forty years ago, it was possible to know a lot about a certain environment - that environment was MS-DOS (for non Mac/UNIX systems). . There was pretty much only a handful of ways to get things going. Enter networking. That added a new wrinkle to how systems worked. Networks back then were finicky. One of my first jobs was working on a 3COM + LAN and it then migrated to LAN Manager. Enter Windows or the graphical user interface. The best depiction of the complexity Windows (OS/2, Windows NT, etc) introduced that I recall was by Charles Petzold (if memory serves) at a local user group meeting. He invited a bunch of people on the stage and then acted as the Windows "Colonel", a nice play on kernel. Each person had a role but to complete their job they always had to pass things back to h...