Skip to main content

Apple's design kills my own "multi-functional hand-held"

As I look over at these drawings, I went over to my filing cabinet and pulled out a rendition I had done up over 15 years ago (maybe even longer - it was before I was doing Fox stuff) of what I thought should be Apple's first "mobile" device. ( I was going to scan it but then thought better of it since Apple's lawyers would probably be all over the "Apple" logo I thought looked cool on it).

Keyboard? Who needs one. From my spec: "A speech digitizer and microphone would record users' comments for layer playback or communications with other users via modem. Microphone would be activated by pressing either of the side buttoms making it easy for both left and right handed people. Speech would be sampled allowing for clear but not stereo quality...compression similar to MACE...one pressed, a control on the screen would relay the digitized message back through the headset or a small speaker"

Oh yeah - but a hand drawn note then said "Extra jack can be used for additional keyboard"

All touch screen and the only buttons on the device would switch you into different "modes" such as modem, day timer or phone numbers.

The neat part was the three jacks : headphone, one for a radio (cellular) antenna and another for direct modem communications.

My vision was that I could record my comments, send them and then software on the receiving end would either a) convert them into text or b) just let them be played.

Total size? 6 inches by 3inches.

Wow - how the world has changed - or has it? Granted, I didn't originally think about video (which is part of what Apple is apparently revealing on Tuesday for their iPods) - and who needs a direct modem jack in this world. But everytime I hear about new patent drawings, I'm always drawn back to this old document.

The saddest thing? I have no DATE on this document. Nada - nothing - so unless I want to hire Dan Rather to do some print and paper dating, I would never be able to prove I had the idea of an "Apple handheld" first.

Ah - what the heck! Here is a quick capture of it:


I always think of all these great ideas that have come up in the past (Markus and I worked on an interactive Form Builder for within an application back in 1995) - things that were ideas that now slowly become reality. Go figure.

» Apple files patent for "multi-functional hand-held" | The Apple Core | ZDNet.com

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Merry Christmas

Whether you celebrate now, have already celebrated your past holiday, are planning to, or not, I hope you find yourself surrounded by family and those you love during this holiday season and are able to remember fondly those who are not with you. We often find ourselves buried in work, or too distracted by other problems, to share and remember a few moments with those closest to us. So many of us are separated by huge distances, we often find it easier to focus on those who are out of arm's reach yet so easy to connect with online, instead of those who are right beside us. So do yourself a favour, put down the keyboard (stylus, mouse, etc) and spend that time. I know I will. Merry Christmas. Powered by ScribeFire .

Who Wants To Be Logical? I Do! I Don't! (with Claude)

In my book, Towards Consciousness, I explore PET , a theory that attempts to explain consciousness and possibly how it might apply to AI. As part of the conversations with AI series, I've included this conversation with Claude.AI in which we were talking about something very different and yet the conversation redirected itself back to PET. For the record, there is no such thing as "Colfsity". A It's interesting to me that people want to proclaim their distinction from being rigid and unlike machines, yet they also complain that the "best" people keep a rigid schedule, regular routines and logic understanding of issues. That's a perceptive observation about a real tension in how people think about themselves and what they value. There does seem to be this paradox where rigidity is simultaneously rejected as "robotic" or inhuman, yet praised when it appears as discipline, consistency, or logical thinking. I think part of what's happening is t...

Programmers vs. Developers vs. Architects

I received an email this morning from Brandon Savage 's newsletter. Brandon's a PHP guru (works at Mozilla) but his newsletter and books have some great overall perspectives for developers of all languages. However, this last one (What's the difference between developers and architects?) kind of rubs me the wrong way. Either that, or I've just missed the natural inflation of job descriptions. (maybe, it's like the change in terminology between Garbage man and Waste Engineer or Secretary and Office Administrator) So maybe it's just me - but I think there's still a big difference between Programmer, Developer and then of course, architect. The key thing here is that every role has a different perspective and every one of those perspectives has value. The original MSF create roles like Product Manager, Program Manager, Developer, Tester, etc - so every concept may pigeon hole people into different roles. But the statements Brandon makes are often distinction...