Skip to main content

Finding patterns...

So now that Rick has put up the FoxBlogs tag cloud, some may be asking "what's a tag cloud?"

Basically it's running the content analysis service from Yahoo (who knew they had one? Everytime Google talks about something, everyone's on it but Yahoo? Needs to do better job of marketing to developers- or maybe I should just listen better )


What does that do? Wow - no wonder no one likes to listen to developers ramble on...they talk and talk and talk but don't really say what it does... (this is because I just went through 5 minutes of links without a good "stand on its own" description.)

Essentially, it attempts to put things into context automatically. For example, when Ken Levy talkes about Headphones, , the entire set of threads are tagged with that term. Now how does it recognize that term? That's the trick.

From Yahoo's own Y!Q (context query), "Y!Q analyzes the context you provide and determines automagically the most important keywords to use." - so you can provide the context but it determines the keywords.

Uh - "automagically?"

In short, it must look for patterns. Patterns are really quite interesting. I'm just starting to read as opposed to listen, to Freakonomics by Steven Levitt and Stephen Drubner.
(
)

(it was on my Audible wish list but I ended up getting the hard copy version)

In one chapter, they describe how they identified that some teachers in the Chicago Public System were cheating on standardized tests (yes, teachers, not students - read the book - very cool chapter on why a teacher would be motivated to cheat) - and they did it through patterns ( teachers "fixed" certain exams with the correct answers in a "pattern").

Now patterns aren't necessarily keywords but it would be very cool to take the TagCloud data at the end of, say, a year, and see if there are any patterns in the way people blog - kind of like a VFP ZeitGeist

I love finding patterns in data - it's one of the things I love about using FoxPro interactively. While the TagCloud application doesn't do the analysis automatically, it is very cool the way it highlights keywords that everyone is talking about (obvious ones like Microsoft, vfp and visual foxpro) and ones that have only been mentioned a few times or only on a particular site (like that all important word, "argh!")

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Elevating Project Specifications with Three Insightful ChatGPT Prompts

For developers and testers, ChatGPT, the freely accessible tool from OpenAI, is game-changing. If you want to learn a new programming language, ask for samples or have it convert your existing code. This can be done in Visual Studio Code (using GitHub CoPilot) or directly in the ChatGPT app or web site.  If you’re a tester, ChatGPT can write a test spec or actual test code (if you use Jest or Cypress) based on existing code, copied and pasted into the input area. But ChatGPT can be of huge value for analysts (whether system or business) who need to validate their needs. There’s often a disconnect between developers and analysts. Analysts complain that developers don’t build what they asked for or ask too many questions. Developers complain that analysts haven’t thought of obvious things. In these situations, ChatGPT can be a great intermediary. At its worst, it forces you to think about and then discount obvious issues. At best, it clarifies the needs into documented requirements. ...

Blogs and RSS come to Microsoft.com

MS has just introduced their portal and it's pretty comprehensive. Nothing quite like learning that some people use AIM instead of MSN messenger, or that there really may be a need for supporting 4 monitors ( Cyrus Complains ) However, it's really a great sign that MS is serious about supporting the blogging community which seems to have um, exploded in size in the past year. Blogs and RSS come to Microsoft.com

I’m Supposed to Know

https://programmingzen.com/im-supposed-to-know/ Great post for developers who are struggling with unrealistic expectations of what they should know and what they shouldn't. Thirty-forty years ago, it was possible to know a lot about a certain environment - that environment was MS-DOS (for non Mac/UNIX systems). . There was pretty much only a handful of ways to get things going. Enter networking. That added a new wrinkle to how systems worked. Networks back then were finicky. One of my first jobs was working on a 3COM + LAN and it then migrated to LAN Manager. Enter Windows or the graphical user interface. The best depiction of the complexity Windows (OS/2, Windows NT, etc) introduced that I recall was by Charles Petzold (if memory serves) at a local user group meeting. He invited a bunch of people on the stage and then acted as the Windows "Colonel", a nice play on kernel. Each person had a role but to complete their job they always had to pass things back to h...