Skip to main content

How many lines of code is ideal for your program?

While looking at the refactoring project over on SednaX, I found myself writing up some quick little code analyzer classes designed to see whether or not a function should be refactored or not.

Looking at that chart, it shows FoxPro has some numbers like 35 single lines of code per function. Wow - that seems low but maybe not.

So tell me - what do you consider to be the ideal number of lines per code / function for readability, maintainability in your programs?




Take the Poll and let me know...


Comments

Anonymous said…
I must be insane and hard to work with. That's all I can think of.

I've picked up a contract working on a VFP project where there is one main VCX with a bunch of classes inside of it. There is another VFP programmer that checks this VCX and VCT in and out of VSS. We are both doing development on our own copies of this VCx at the same time. THis class has methods/functions are huge with hundreds of lines of code, that were already ther and need refactoring.

When we "merge" our changes, it ends up being me that has to redo my edits into his master copy of the VCX. (Beyond Compare takes care of merging the PRG based changes.)

I had refactored some of his mega functions so I could use a subsection of the code and it caused a minor problem when they had to rush all of our changes into production because of another emergency.

I recently suggested that we break the big VCX into a VCX per class to ease checkin/checkouts, version control, and development. The response was "Not ready to break up the vc*, we have enough trouble getting bugs out of what we do breaking into separate functions."

I must be insane and difficult to work with.
November 10, 2005 at 9:29 AM
Andrew MacNeill said…
not if you look at the results of the poll. Seems like most like the idea of fewer lines per piece.
November 11, 2005 at 5:09 PM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Elevating Project Specifications with Three Insightful ChatGPT Prompts

For developers and testers, ChatGPT, the freely accessible tool from OpenAI, is game-changing. If you want to learn a new programming language, ask for samples or have it convert your existing code. This can be done in Visual Studio Code (using GitHub CoPilot) or directly in the ChatGPT app or web site.  If you’re a tester, ChatGPT can write a test spec or actual test code (if you use Jest or Cypress) based on existing code, copied and pasted into the input area. But ChatGPT can be of huge value for analysts (whether system or business) who need to validate their needs. There’s often a disconnect between developers and analysts. Analysts complain that developers don’t build what they asked for or ask too many questions. Developers complain that analysts haven’t thought of obvious things. In these situations, ChatGPT can be a great intermediary. At its worst, it forces you to think about and then discount obvious issues. At best, it clarifies the needs into documented requirements. ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Respect

Respect is something humans give to each other through personal connection. It’s the bond that forms when we recognize something—or someone—as significant, relatable, or worthy of care. This connection doesn’t have to be limited to people. There was an  article  recently that described the differing attitudes towards AI tools such as ChatGPT and Google Gemini (formerly Bard). Some people treat them like a standard search while others form a sort of personal relationship — being courteous, saying “please” and “thank you”. Occasionally, people share extra details unrelated to their question, like, ‘I’m going to a wedding. What flower goes well with a tuxedo?’ Does an AI “care” how you respond to it? Of course not — it reflects the patterns it’s trained on. Yet our interaction shapes how these tools evolve, and that influence is something we should take seriously. Most of us have all expressed frustration when an AI “hallucinates”. Real or not, the larger issue is that we have hi...
Post a Comment
Read more

Friend vs Therapist vs LLM: Shades of Grey

The conversations with AI series brings up a single point and then compares it between different LLM engines. These types of conversations were one of the many contributing factors to my writing of " Towards Consciousness " that explores the benefits and issues of creating a conscious AI. In this scenario, I was interested in seeing how an LLM might differ from a friend or therapist on issues that may have nuanced responses or contexts. In doing so, I came up with an interesting discussion on shades of grey. My Premise: Is it a bit strange to be using an LLM as a sober second thought? Every time I walk down this path of “why use an LLM to do certain things”, I come back to the alternatives that people like to say. “Why not bring it up with a friend?” A friend typically has your back or will say whatever to support their own agenda. “A therapist?” That’s someone who is “trained” to be impartial. But a computer? A computer is impartial based on two logical outcomes. If you say ...
Post a Comment
Read more