Skip to main content

Running Dynamic Code with ExecScript

The Wiki has an interesting post on how to run dynamic code. While much of the post deals with using BINDEVENT, I just want to make a note on ExecScript.

This is one of the best additions to Visual FoxPro. In one application, we used to offer the ability for users to write their own validation rules (provided they knew how to write FoxPro expressions). Now, we take it even further: they can write their own full scripts.

Not only that - but we offer popular rule "templates" that users can build their existing rules from and use TEXTMERGE to fill in the appropriate values.

How so?

A rule table with a field for
Rule Description (cdesc)
Rule Script (mrule)
Rule Parameter (cparm)

The code that executes the rule does a

EXECSCRIPT(TEXTMERGE(mrule,"*PARM*",cParm))

The user only needs to fill in the Rule Description and the parameter - everything else is hidden from them.

Our templates start with easy to use templates like : This field must be filled in or here is a valid list of values to "Don't allow this entry unless today's date is Dec 31 and the user's name is XXXX".

By using rule templates, more advanced support staff can write rules that others then simply re-use by filling in the templates.

Previously, we had a bunch of FXP files lying around in folders where people had to learn the expression and the parameters. With ExecScript, you can put all of these into a library of functions and call them with Friendly names.

"Oh you need to send an email to a user?" Instead of making them learn how to write SENDEMAIL.PRG, they can call a function library call like

CallFunction("Send Email", "person@company.com", "Hi")

This is almost like going back to macros in Excel and Lotus days, but it becomes infinitely easier on the end user.

If you've never used ExecScript, try it out.

It's been in Visual FoxPro since VFP 7.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Merry Christmas

Whether you celebrate now, have already celebrated your past holiday, are planning to, or not, I hope you find yourself surrounded by family and those you love during this holiday season and are able to remember fondly those who are not with you. We often find ourselves buried in work, or too distracted by other problems, to share and remember a few moments with those closest to us. So many of us are separated by huge distances, we often find it easier to focus on those who are out of arm's reach yet so easy to connect with online, instead of those who are right beside us. So do yourself a favour, put down the keyboard (stylus, mouse, etc) and spend that time. I know I will. Merry Christmas. Powered by ScribeFire .

Programmers vs. Developers vs. Architects

I received an email this morning from Brandon Savage 's newsletter. Brandon's a PHP guru (works at Mozilla) but his newsletter and books have some great overall perspectives for developers of all languages. However, this last one (What's the difference between developers and architects?) kind of rubs me the wrong way. Either that, or I've just missed the natural inflation of job descriptions. (maybe, it's like the change in terminology between Garbage man and Waste Engineer or Secretary and Office Administrator) So maybe it's just me - but I think there's still a big difference between Programmer, Developer and then of course, architect. The key thing here is that every role has a different perspective and every one of those perspectives has value. The original MSF create roles like Product Manager, Program Manager, Developer, Tester, etc - so every concept may pigeon hole people into different roles. But the statements Brandon makes are often distinction...

From Writing to AI: the pattern repeats itself

When I was ten years old, my dad bought a computer and, thanks to an advertising supplement in a Superman comic I read, it was a TRS-80. A month later, he dragged the entire family (my mom and brother were not the most enthusiastic) to a class at Radio Shack teaching how to use microcomputers. At the time, I understood why my mom wasn’t that excited: the computer was yet another gadget in the house. But today I find it fascinating. My mother went to Vassar in the 50s. She learned how to type — not a common skill at the time — but it opened doors. Her ability to communicate effectively led her to a career in adult education and later communications work with the CBC (Canadian Broadcasting Corporation). This isn’t a nostalgia post. Today, the ability to use artificial intelligence, be it through Copilot or simply writing the right prompt, is becoming a critical skill. But is it really that novel? In the 1500s and 1600s, the printing press gradually made reading accessible beyond cler...