Skip to main content

Conference On the Web Part II

It's an idea that I'd love to gauge interest for. While I know everyone likes to get together and physically "bond" at a conference, the technology is now available (readily) for a true virtual conference - where sessions are given via on-screen demonstrations, tele-conferences, even some with video..
 
I know many of the companies I work with will be offering individual one-on-ones of this nature in the near future but why not expand it a little bit to an entire "Virtual DevCon" where sessions are given on a number of topics. See my previous post for full ideas on that.
 
There wouldn't necessarily be a need for multiple tracks because one conference could offer different times for all of the various tracks over a 2-3 day period.
 
There are obviously some gotchas:
a) the main one is making sure people are good "online" presenters. I've seen great online presentations and I've seen terrible ones. If we follow concepts in Beyond Bullets but also make the entire conference follow a strong theme, it would be very easy to manage. And since everyone could "try out" their sessions online wherever they are, they would almost always be running off their own machines.
 
b) internal cost. Someone needs to sponsor online.  I don't know how Live Meeting is managed when they do those sign-up seminars. I can't imagine authors are paying those $$ to promote their books. I do know that WebEx is kind of expensive in that manner. We have 6 licenses and it costs $1200/month for them. Anyone know? I'm going to research it but if you know of inexpensive GOOD options, let me know. 
 
c) mediators. On a web conference, the real need is to have a mediator who watches for notes and then answers them if need be. So all questions can be answered as they go through.
 
But there are huge benefits here. The cost of the conference notwithstanding, the actual cost would be considerably lower than a regular conference (For both the attendees (something speakers typically forget) and organizers) and you would have added benefit of real streaming, and live recording going on at the same time.  Of course, larger companies and user groups could get really involved here with study groups, etc. We've seen the benefit of when many people attend public chats and then that information is posted.
 
It also brings up a point that I know many other speakers have made in the past - a single repository for all conference materials. This type of idea would make not just the materials but also the recorded presentation, a major benefit.
 
One downside though: how do you hold a speaker dinner online? <bg> I know IBM showed a Jam session from 6 different countries in one commercial but I think dinner might be a bit trickier.
 
Who's interested?
 
 
 
 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Elevating Project Specifications with Three Insightful ChatGPT Prompts

For developers and testers, ChatGPT, the freely accessible tool from OpenAI, is game-changing. If you want to learn a new programming language, ask for samples or have it convert your existing code. This can be done in Visual Studio Code (using GitHub CoPilot) or directly in the ChatGPT app or web site.  If you’re a tester, ChatGPT can write a test spec or actual test code (if you use Jest or Cypress) based on existing code, copied and pasted into the input area. But ChatGPT can be of huge value for analysts (whether system or business) who need to validate their needs. There’s often a disconnect between developers and analysts. Analysts complain that developers don’t build what they asked for or ask too many questions. Developers complain that analysts haven’t thought of obvious things. In these situations, ChatGPT can be a great intermediary. At its worst, it forces you to think about and then discount obvious issues. At best, it clarifies the needs into documented requirements. ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Respect

Respect is something humans give to each other through personal connection. It’s the bond that forms when we recognize something—or someone—as significant, relatable, or worthy of care. This connection doesn’t have to be limited to people. There was an  article  recently that described the differing attitudes towards AI tools such as ChatGPT and Google Gemini (formerly Bard). Some people treat them like a standard search while others form a sort of personal relationship — being courteous, saying “please” and “thank you”. Occasionally, people share extra details unrelated to their question, like, ‘I’m going to a wedding. What flower goes well with a tuxedo?’ Does an AI “care” how you respond to it? Of course not — it reflects the patterns it’s trained on. Yet our interaction shapes how these tools evolve, and that influence is something we should take seriously. Most of us have all expressed frustration when an AI “hallucinates”. Real or not, the larger issue is that we have hi...
Post a Comment
Read more

I’m Supposed to Know

https://programmingzen.com/im-supposed-to-know/ Great post for developers who are struggling with unrealistic expectations of what they should know and what they shouldn't. Thirty-forty years ago, it was possible to know a lot about a certain environment - that environment was MS-DOS (for non Mac/UNIX systems). . There was pretty much only a handful of ways to get things going. Enter networking. That added a new wrinkle to how systems worked. Networks back then were finicky. One of my first jobs was working on a 3COM + LAN and it then migrated to LAN Manager. Enter Windows or the graphical user interface. The best depiction of the complexity Windows (OS/2, Windows NT, etc) introduced that I recall was by Charles Petzold (if memory serves) at a local user group meeting. He invited a bunch of people on the stage and then acted as the Windows "Colonel", a nice play on kernel. Each person had a role but to complete their job they always had to pass things back to h...
Post a Comment
Read more