Skip to main content

Beware of how the FILTER() works

Some older applications use the FILTER ( ) function in Visual FoxPro to identify what the current filter on a file is.
 
Be warned that what this function returns isn't always what a filter was originally set to.
 
Here are some examples:
 
USE HOME(2) + "TASTRADE\DATA\CUSTOMER"
SET FILTER TO region<>"NC"
 
? FILTER ( )
 
This Returns region#"NC"
 
But it gets better than this:
SET FILTER TO (company_name!="Alfred" OR region<>"NC") AND country = "United States"
 
Returns (COMPANY_NAME#"Alfred".OR.REGION#"NC").AND.COUNTRY="United States"
 
For most cases, this won't hurt anyone's code but it's a real pain when you're trying to translate the FILTER() statement to match an original filter. For example, in one application, we have a table that looks like this:
 
cDesc C(30)
cFilter M
 
The cDesc field contains a friendly name like "Important Customers" or "Customers who I need to call" and the filter contains a valid FoxPro expression.
 
The problem is unless you store the variable of the Desc somewhere else, you'll never be able to properly identify what the description is without major work. What kind of work? Well, here's a sample of some code:
 
SELECT * FROM FILTERS INTO ARRAY laFilters
lcRealFilter = UPPER(ALLTRIM(FILTER() ))

FOR lnI=1 TO ALEN(laFilters,1)

lcValue=UPPER(ALLTRIM(lafilters(lnI,2)))

IF lcValue==lcFilter
    lnValue=lnI
** Match found
EXIT
ELSE

ENDIF

ENDFOR

(Note: no - this code isn't optimized!)

But then I also have to check all of these individual conditions:

lcValue=STRTRAN(lcValue,' OR ','.OR.')
lcValue=STRTRAN(lcValue,' $ ','$')
lcValue=STRTRAN(lcValue,['],["])
lcValue=STRTRAN(lcValue,' AND ','.AND.')
lcValue = STRTRAN(lcValue,"<>","#")
lcValue = STRTRAN(lcValue,"!=","#")
lcValue = STRTRAN(lcValue,"!",".NOT.")

It's not pretty but it works. Are there any others? Let me know.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Merry Christmas

Whether you celebrate now, have already celebrated your past holiday, are planning to, or not, I hope you find yourself surrounded by family and those you love during this holiday season and are able to remember fondly those who are not with you. We often find ourselves buried in work, or too distracted by other problems, to share and remember a few moments with those closest to us. So many of us are separated by huge distances, we often find it easier to focus on those who are out of arm's reach yet so easy to connect with online, instead of those who are right beside us. So do yourself a favour, put down the keyboard (stylus, mouse, etc) and spend that time. I know I will. Merry Christmas. Powered by ScribeFire .

Who Wants To Be Logical? I Do! I Don't! (with Claude)

In my book, Towards Consciousness, I explore PET , a theory that attempts to explain consciousness and possibly how it might apply to AI. As part of the conversations with AI series, I've included this conversation with Claude.AI in which we were talking about something very different and yet the conversation redirected itself back to PET. For the record, there is no such thing as "Colfsity". A It's interesting to me that people want to proclaim their distinction from being rigid and unlike machines, yet they also complain that the "best" people keep a rigid schedule, regular routines and logic understanding of issues. That's a perceptive observation about a real tension in how people think about themselves and what they value. There does seem to be this paradox where rigidity is simultaneously rejected as "robotic" or inhuman, yet praised when it appears as discipline, consistency, or logical thinking. I think part of what's happening is t...

Programmers vs. Developers vs. Architects

I received an email this morning from Brandon Savage 's newsletter. Brandon's a PHP guru (works at Mozilla) but his newsletter and books have some great overall perspectives for developers of all languages. However, this last one (What's the difference between developers and architects?) kind of rubs me the wrong way. Either that, or I've just missed the natural inflation of job descriptions. (maybe, it's like the change in terminology between Garbage man and Waste Engineer or Secretary and Office Administrator) So maybe it's just me - but I think there's still a big difference between Programmer, Developer and then of course, architect. The key thing here is that every role has a different perspective and every one of those perspectives has value. The original MSF create roles like Product Manager, Program Manager, Developer, Tester, etc - so every concept may pigeon hole people into different roles. But the statements Brandon makes are often distinction...