Skip to main content

Pet Peeves: _SCREEN.Activeform

While it's a great product, there are just times that FoxPro really drives me nuts.

A great example? _SCREEN.Activeform.

I know people have ranted about this for years so now it's my turn.

_SCREEN.Activeform returns a pointer to the current form object. But what if there's no current form?

Does it return NULL? An empty string?

No. It errors out.

Does anyone know what the reasoning was here?

Now, you can verify it by doing

IF TYPE("_SCREEN.Activeform")="U"
** Now you KNOW there's no form there.
ELSE
ENDIF

but then you still have to do a

IF NOT ISNULL(_SCREEN.Activeform)

ENDIF

Note that you can't use VARTYPE() because Activeform isn't a variable. (example : VARTYPE(_SCREEN.activeform)) - which is a shame because VARTYPE is the faster of the two.

In that blog post, if you read the comments, you'll hear things like "use PEMSTATUS" instead of Type for objects but the problem here is that ActiveForm IS a valid property for _SCREEN (unless you actually want to refer to it).

I thought I could be clever and maybe look at _SCREEN.FormCount but guess what? If a form is defined but hidden, the ActiveForm is still not there but FormCount is 1.

So the end result is you HAVE to use the slower, uglier type approach to get out of these annoying checks for _SCREEN.Activeform.

IF TYPE("_SCREEN.Activeform")<>"U"
** do something with it - _SCREEN.Activeform
ELSE
** don't do anything otherwise you'll error out.
ENDIF

Now will users notice the performance penalty? That's a tough call - but I do know that it adds three unnecessary lines of code which adds to the Refactorability of a program.

Comments

Anonymous said…
I usually use
IF TYPE("_SCREEN.Activeform.Name") = "C"
*- Do something with it
ENDIF

The typecheck for the property digs into the object if it exists. The type-function internal error catch will catch the error (but sets the MESSAGE() returned value. what's up with that, anyhow?)
No need for the ISNULL() check.

Sietse Wijnker
Anonymous said…
If you have an ActiveX control on a form sometimes _SCREEN.ActiveForm refers to the control, not to the form it's on. I haven't tested if this bug has been fixed in the meantime, because our framework has a method to return the active form that deals with it.

Popular posts from this blog

Blogs and RSS come to Microsoft.com

MS has just introduced their portal and it's pretty comprehensive. Nothing quite like learning that some people use AIM instead of MSN messenger, or that there really may be a need for supporting 4 monitors ( Cyrus Complains ) However, it's really a great sign that MS is serious about supporting the blogging community which seems to have um, exploded in size in the past year. Blogs and RSS come to Microsoft.com

FoxInCloud Stats

FoxInCloud sent this link a while back about their statistics regarding visits to their site: http://foxincloud.com/blog/2017/12/27/VFP-community-lessons-from-foxincloud-site.html What's interesting here is the breakdown of people. Yes, I think it's understandable that the Fox community is getting older. Another factor is the growth of the mobile and web environments taking over development. These environments really do push people towards the newer non-SQL or free SQL/hosted environments but more towards hosted storage options like Amazon and Google. A tool like FoxInCloud that helps MOVE existing applications to the cloud inherently competes with those environments. But FoxInCloud also allows developers to extend their application further by giving them a starting point using Javascript and the basic CSS (such as Bootstrap). If you're not rebuilding your application from scratch, it's certainly a great step forward. FoxPro VFP

Facebook Revolt - imeem alternatives?

When Scoble noted how Facebook under major revolt , I immediately thought of a site I found yesterday. The value offered by Facebook's feeds however do seem very cool - if only they had been smart and made them opt-in, instead of opt-out. I have been impressed though with Facebook's opening of their API's - they certainly get it that they need to open it up to developers. I haven't really explored this other site, beyond my first look. In some ways, I think the whole social networking site thing is just silly , but this site (imeem) definitely showed some value. I could find music (as posted by the artist), it worked in Firefox and it allowed people to rank, add to delicious and more. And when I'm looking at someone, I can see what they're up to (or rather what they allow us to see). Anyways, you may want to check it out.